Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

QBfficeof tip !Zlttornep @merat &ate of lltexae DAN MORALES ATTORNEY GENERAL July 29,1996 The Honorable Robert Junell Okion No. DM-404 Chair, Committee on Appropriations - Texas House of Representatives Re: Whether the Texas Commission on Jail P.O. Box 2910 St~dards has jurisdiction over a prison hous- Austin, Texas 78768-2910 iq only federal inmates (RQ-883) Dear Representative Junelh The United States Attorney Geenerdhas sole authority to control and manage a federal penal and correctional institution. Under her direction, the federal Bureau of Pris- ons manages and regulates all federal penal and correctional institutions. You rekr to the Eden Detention Center, a penal and corrccuonal institution, that houses only federal pris- oners and that the City of Eden leases and operates pursuant to a contract with the federal government. You ask whether the Texas Commission on Jail Standards may regulate and inspect the Eden Detention Center. Because fhderal law vests in the United States Attor- ney General and the federal Bureau of Prisons sole authority to control, manage, and regulate federal penal and correctional institutions, we conclude the Texas Commission on Jail Standards has no jurisdiction over the Eden Detention Center. You state that in 1985 the City of Eden executed an intergovemmental agreement with the federal Bureau of Prisons, whereby the city agreed to provide custody, care, treatment, and subsistence of federal prisoners.I In accordance with the agreanent, the city leased the Eden Detention Center, which currently is owned by a nonprofit corpora- tion organized under the Texas Non-Profit Corporation Act.* A corporation specializing in prison management manages the Eden Detention Centers You aver that the Eden Detention Center has housed only federal inmates and de- tflillws: With the exception of a few month9 period of non-occupancy of [the detention center] caused by a tire, the City has continuously housed The Honorable Robert Junell - Page 2 (DM-404) federal inmates at [the de-tentioncenter] under the [itergovemmental agreement]. The only other persons incarcerated at [the detention center] since October 1985 have been federal inmates/detainees placed in [the center] under an intergovernmental services agreement with [the Immigrationand Natmah&ion Service]. [The detention center] is not and has never been used as a municipaljail or detention fkcility. It has never been used to house inmates or detainees of the City, of the State of Texas[,] or any of its political subdivisions. Furthermore, you state that the federal Bureau of Prisons has, since the Eden Detention Center opened in 1985, monitored, inspected, and overseen the detention center’s opera- tiOltS. You indicate that the Texas Commissionon Jail Standards (the “commission”) be- lieves it may monitor and regulate the Eden Detention Center. As we understand the commission’s argument, it believes Local Government Code chapter 361 requires the .commission’sinvohment. Local Government Code section 361.061 authorizes the gov- erning body of a municipalityto contract with a private vendor to operate or manage a jail or detention center. Nevertheless, the contract must require the private vendor to comply with the commission’s minimtmt standards and to be certified by the commission.4 The commission evidently construes chapter 361 to apply to a penal and correctional facility that a private vendor operates for a municipality but that houses federal prisoners exclu- sively. You ask four specific questions about the commission’s authority to monitor and regulate the Eden Detention Center. Because we determine that the commission has no authority to monitor and regulate the Eden Detention Center, we need not aitswer your speciiic questions. We derive our answer from federal law. Under 18 U.S.C. 8 4001, the United States Attorney General has sole authority to control and manage a federal penal and cor- rectional institution. Under the Attorney General’s direction, the federal Bureau of Prisons has charge of the management and regulation of all federal penal and correctional institution.s.5 Federal law tixes the duty of care the Bureau of Prisons owes to federal prisoners, and that law prevails over an inconsistent state law.6 The Attorney General may contract with a political subdivision of a state for the imprisonment or care of United States priaoners7 We assume that, pursuant to this statutory authority, the federal government contracted with the City of Eden to house fed- ‘Lccd Gov’tCkdc5 361.062(l). 518U.8.C.5 4042(1);wdm28 C.F.RpartO,mbpartQ. WnitedStutesv. Munit,374U.S. 150,164-65 (lW3); seedsu U.S. Cmm. art.VL ‘18 U.S.C. 8 4003;sc olpo28 CER 0 O.%(V). The Honorable Robert June11- Page 3 (DM-404) tral inmates. Because the Eden Detention Center houses solely federal inmates,* it is a federal penal and wtmctional institutions subject only to the United States Attorney Gen- eral and, at her direction, to the federal Bureau of Prisons. The commission thus has no jurisdiction over the Eden Detention Center. Jncidentagy, we do not believe the legislature ever contemplated that the wmmis- sion would assume jurisdiction over federal penal and wrrectional institutions. Government Code section 511.009(a) requires the commission to adopt minimum stan- dards for the operation of county jails and for the treatment of inmates in the county jails. While county jails is not defined to exclude an institution housing only federal prisoners and detainees,*0we believe the legislature intended to so limit the detkition. In addition, Local Government Code section 361.061 authorizes a municipality to contract with a pri- vate vendor to operate a jail or detention center, but the private vendor must operate the hility in wmpliance with standards adopted by the wmmission.tt While we tind nothing that defines the terms “jail”or “detention center” for purposes of Local Government Code chapter 361, we again believe the legislature intended to limit these terms to exclude art institution housing only federal prisoners and detainees. Indeed, to construe either of these statutes as applicable to a federal penal and wrrectional i&tution, thereby subject- ing the institution to the wmmission’s jut&diction, would be inconsistent with the United States Attorney General’s and the Bureau of Prison’s exclusive authority. The statutes thus would violate the supremacy clause of the United States Constitution,t2 which re- quires inconsistent state laws to yield to valid federal laws and mgulationsts We must presume, however, that the legislature intends its enactments to be wnstitutional.t4 Fiiy, we must distinguish our wncluaion and Attorney General Opiion JM-1260, in which we concluded that minimumstandards adopted by the commission ap- ply to a municipaljail operated by a private vendor under Local Government Code chapter 361.15 The requestor in that instance was not wncemed with penal and wrrectional insti- tutions located in the state housing only federal prisoners, in accordance with a wntract 9C/: AttorneyGeoeralopinionMW-328 (1981)at 1. lOGovwnma Cedesection511.001(Z) d&es “cmmtyjait” as “a faciliv cpaxtcdLy or for a onuyforthc confinrmentOfpcrsoWWWSCdOrCOnvictedd8llOffWSC." “Led God code 5 361.062(l). ‘~8TAnscoNsT.alt.vl,cl.2. “~~Atlorny~opinion~-1269(199o)(It6(citingFirlcli~Frd Sm. &LomA.&nv. dr loCuesto, 458 U.S. 141,152(1982);Selrerv.Vej’hz,7% S.W.26 303 (2%. 1988)). “Expmrr Gmes, 571S.W.2d888,893(Ct Caia Apf~ 1978)(a~ bauc). 15Attomey Gowml o9inionJM.1260 (1990)at 5. The Honorable Robert Junell - Page 4 (DM-404) between a municipality and the federal government. Because it is distinguishable, Attor- ney General Opiion JM-1260 is irrelevant to your question. SUMMARY The Texas Commission on Jail Standards has no authority to regulate or inspect a penal and wrrectional ktitution housing only federal prisoners and detainees. The tams “county jail” in Govemment Code chapter 5 11 and “jail” and “detention center” in Local Government Code chapter 361 do not include a penal and correctional institution housing only fed- eral prisoners and detainees. DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas JORGE VEGA Fii Assistant Attorney General SARAHJ.SHJRLBY Chair, Opiion Committee Prepared by Kymberly K. Oltrogge Assistant Attorney General