Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

QBfficeof tty !ZlttomepQhneral Btate of flCexae DAN MORALES August 27,1992 ATTORNEY GENERAL Honorable Tim Curry opinion No. DM-159 Crimimd District Attorney Tar-rant County Re: Constitutionality of section 756.042, 401 W. Belknap Health and Safety Code, which requires Fort Worth, Texas 76196-0201 outdoor shooting ranges to be constructed according to standards set by the National Rifle Association (RQ385) Dear Mr. Curry: You have requested our opinion regarding the constitutionality of section 756.042 of the Health and Safety Code. That statute provides: The owner of an outdoor shooting range shall construct and maintain the range according to standards that are at least as stringent as the standards printed in the National Rifle Association range manual. As you indicate, this statute does not specify a particular edition of the range manual. You suggest that, as a result, section 756.042 is an unconstitutional delegation of legislative authority. In Dudding v. Automatic Gas Co., 193 S.W.2d 517 (Tex. 1946), the court considered a 1939 statute which required that containers for the storage of liquefied petroleum gas conform to standards “as recommended by the National Fire Protection Association, effective July, 1937, a copy of said regulations known as the National Board of Fire Underwriters Pamphlet No. 58 being on file with the Gas Utilities Division of the Railroad Commission of Texas.” Id. at 519. The court distinguished the statute before it from the one held invalid in Stare v. Cmwford, 177 P. 360 (Ran. 1919). In the Crawford case, the statute under attack adopted “present as well as prospective rules of an unofficial association as a standard of conduct, departure from which would have been a crime.” The Texas Supreme Court p. 839 Honorable Tim Curry - Page 2 (m-159) observed that such delegation of legislative powers to a private association would contravene article III, section 1 of the Texas Constitution. The Texas court then declared: We do not have before us a situation where future rules of an unofficial agency have been prospectively adopted by the legislature. Id at 520. With regard to section 756.042, however, we do in fact “have before us a situation where future rules of an unofficial agency have been prospectively adopted by the legislature.” Since the ambit of the statute. is not limited to a particular edition of the range manual, it fails to meet the standard adopted in L&Id@. This view is confirmed by more recent cases from other jurisdictions. In J&stem Fed Corp. v. Wksson, 316 S.E.2d 373 (S.C. 1984). for example, the court held that a statute which imposed a 20 percent tax on admissions only to those motion pictures rated X by the Motion Picture Association of America, or not rated at all, constituted an unlawful delegation of legislative authority to a private association” Id. at 374. Likewise, in News PGnting Co. v. Bonn@ of Touwa, 511 A.2d 139 (NJ. Super. Ct. Law Div. 1986). the court said that an ordinance which banned newsracks within 200 feet of any church unless the church waived the prohibition was unconstitutional in granting legislative power to a private entity. Id. at 162; see uLro North Am Sa&v Valve h&s., Inc v. Wo&st, 672 F. Supp. 488, 493-94 (D. Kan. 1987); Srpte v. Ch&ie, 766 P.2d 1198,120s (Haw. 1988 ) cert denied, 490 U.S. 1067 (1989) Bulova Watch Co.. Inc v. Brand D&ribs. qf N Wilkebom, Im, 206 S.E.2d 141.146 (N.C. 1974). On the basis of the language in Dudding, 193 S.W.2d 517, and the unmistakable thrust of the law in other jurisdictions, we conclude that section 756.042, as currently written, is an invalid attempt to confer legislative authority on a private association, in clear contravention of article III, section 1 of the Texas COIlStitUtiOXL Section 756.042, Health and Safety Code. which require outdoor shooting ranges to be constructed according to p. 840 Honorable Tim Curry - Page 3 m-159) standards promulgated by the National Rifle Association, is an invalid attempt to confer legislative authority on a private entity in contravention of article Ill, section 1 of the Texas ChlStitUtiOll. DAN MORALES Attorney General of Texas WILL PRYOR First Assistant Attorney General MARYKELLER Deputy Assistant Attorney General RENEAHIW Special Assistant Attorney General MADELEINB B. JOHNSON Chair, Opinion Committee Prepared by Rick Gilpin Deputy Chief, Opinion Committee p. 841