Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

August 31, 1971 Honorable Henry Wade Opinion No. M-945 District Attorney Dallas County Government Center Dallas, Texas 75202 Re: Whether the term “two terms or more as a duly elected justice of the peace” used in H.B. 168, Acts 62nd Leg. , R. S. , 1971 (codified as Art. 5972, V. C. S. ) re- quires the completion of service of two full terms Dear Mr. Wade: in that office. You have requested an opinion from this office on the following ques- tion: Is a justice of the peace, who is not a licensed attorney but who completed one full four year term, beginning January 1, 1967, and was re- elected and started his second term January 1, 1971, exempt from taking a forty hour course in the performance of his duties under the provisions of Section 2 of Article 5972, Vernon’s Civil Statutes (as amended by H. B. 168, p. 1110, Session Laws, Acts 62nd Leg., R.S., 1971). Article 5972 as amended reads in part as follows: “Art. 5972. ‘Incompetency. ’ “(a) By ‘incompetency’ as used herein is meant gross ignorance of official duties, or gross carelessness in the discharge of them: or an officer may be found to be incompetent when, by reason of some serious physical or mental defect, not existing at the time of his election, he has become unfit or unable to discharge promptly and properly the duties of his office. “(b) In the case of a justice of the peace who is not a licensed attorney, ‘incompetency’ also includes the failure to successfully -4627 - Honorable Henry Wade, page 2 (M-945) complete within one year from the date he is first elected, or if he is in office on the effective date of this Act, one year from the effective date of this Act, a forty-hour course in the per- formance of his duties; said course to be completed in any accredited state-supported school of higher education. “Section 2. Persons having served two terms or more as a duly elected justice of the peace are exempted from provisions of subsection (b) of this Act. (Emphasis added) Section 65 of Article XVI of the Constitution of Texas sets the term of office for a justice of the peace at four years. In the case of Board of Education of Pendleton County v. Gulick, 398 S. W. 2d 483, (Ky. Ct. App. 1966) we find the following definition for term of office. ” ‘Term’ is thus identified and defined as a certain and fixed period of four years. It commences when the mayor is elected and inducted into office, and ends at the end of four years for which he is elected. *’ Therefore, it is our opinion that the words, “persons having served two terms or more as a duly elected justice of the peace, ” as set out in Section 2 of Article 5972, supra, could have but one meaning under the clear wording of the statute. This meaning is that a justice of the peace, to be exempt from attending the forty hour course as required by the statute, must have served a minimum of two terms of four years each, to be exempt from the provisions of this Act. SUMMARY Under the provisions of Section 2 of Article 5972, V. C. S. , as amended by H. B. 168, Acts 62nd Legislature, R. S., 1971, a justice of the peace must have served a minimum of two terms, of four years each, to be exempt from attending the forty hour course of instruction as required under the provi- sions of the Act. -4628- Honorable Henry Wade, page 3 (M-945) Yfls very truly, Prepared by John H. Banks Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Max P. Flusche Ray McGregor Dyer Moore, Jr. William J. Craig ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant -4629-