Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

August 5, 1971 Honorable Cecil M. Pruett Opinion No. M-921 County Attorney Hutchinson County Courthouse Re: Construction of House Bill Borger, Texas 79007 384, Acts 62nd Leg., R.S. 1971, Ch. 622, p. 2019, re- lating to the compensation, expenses and allowances of certain officers and em- ployees. DearMr. Pruett: Your request for an opinion on the above subject matter asks the following questions: "Question No.~ 1 "Does Section 8 of H.B. 384 repeal that part of Article 2338-7 which provides that the com- pensation of the Judge of the Court of Domestic Relations in Hutchinson County shall be the same as that allowed other district judges? "Question NO. 2 "Does Section 7(4) of H.B. 384 exclude the Judge of the Court of Domestic Relations of Hutchinson County, so that it will not apply to compensation of such Judge? "If the answer to the above question No. 1 is ‘NO’ or to the above question No. 2 is 'Yes', then the following questions are immaterial. "Question No. 3 -4495- Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, Page 2 (M-921) "Is H.B. 384 effective as of August 30, 1971, except as to salaries, expenses, and allowances paid beginning January 1, 1972? "Question No. 4 "In the event Section No. 8 repeals the pro- vision for the Judge of the Court of'.Domestic Re- lations to receive the same salary as the district judge, then what would be the minimum which he can be paid under provisions of Section 1 of H-8. 384-- $20,000. or $22,000. per year? "Question No. 5 "In the event the Commissioners Court should fix the compensation of the Judge of the Court of Domestic Relations under.H.B. 384, may the Com- missioner's Court fix the salary for the remainder this year, beginning September 1, 1971, ~without advertising as set out in Section 2(a) and Section 6 of H.B. 384?" Section 7 of House Bill 384, Acts 62nd Deg., R.S. 1971, Ch. 622, p. 2019 (codified in Vernon's as Article 3912k, Vernon's Civil Statutes), provides in part: "Sec. 7. Nothing in this Act applies to com- pensation, expenses, or allowances of: I,. . . "(4) judges of all courts of record and all justices of the peace, and presiding judges of commissioners courts in counties having a population of 1,700,OOO or more, according to the last preceding Federal census." -4496- Honorable Cecil M. Pruett, page 3 (M-921) The' "Court of Domestic Relations in and for Hutchinson County" is a court of record. Article V, Section 1, Texas Con- stitution: Article 2338-7, Vernon's Civil Statutes: Jordan v. Crudqinton, 231 S.W.2d 641 (Tex.Sup. 1950). Therefore, the pro- visions of House Bill 384 are not applicable to the Judge of the Court of Domestic Relations in and for Hutchinson County. In view of our answer to this question, it is unnecessary to answer your remaining questions. SUMMARY The provisions of House Bill 384, Acts 62nd Leg.. R.S. 1971, Ch. 622, p. 2019, are not appli- cable to the Judge of the Court of Domestic Re- lations in and for Hutchinson County, since judges of courts of record are specifically excluded by the provisions of Section 7 of House Bill 384. V? truly yours, neral of Texas Prepared by John Reeves Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W. E. Allen, Co-Chairman Ben Harrison Jack Sparks S. J. Aronson Sam McDaniel MF.ADE F. GRIFFIN Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER Executive Assistant NOLA WHITE First Assistant -4497-