Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

R-679 THEA ORNEY ENERAL OF TEXAS Hon. John C. Marburger Opinion No. V-326 County Attorney Fayette County lte: Applicability to Fayette La Grange, Texas County of H.B. 257, 50th Legislature, relative to County Juvenile Boards. Dear Sir: We refer to your recent request for our opln- ion as to whether Fayette County falls within the pro- visions of Article 5139, V. C. S., as amended by H. B. 257, Acts of the 50th Legislature, 1947, Vernon's Texas Session Law Service, page 560, the pertinent part of which Is as followsr A . . . or which county is included Ui and forms a part of a Judicial District of five (5) or more counties, in one (1) or more of which counties the civil and orim- inal jurisdiction vesting by Oeneral Law in the County Court has been, or hereafter shall be, transferred to the exclusive ju- risdiction of the District Court of such county or counties, and having a combined population in such Judicial District of more than thirty-five thousand (35,000) ln- habitants, according to the last preceding Federal Census; . . . the Judge of such Ju- dicial District, together with the County Judge of such county are hereby constituted a Juvenile Board for such county. The mem- bers composing such Juvenile Board in each such county shall each be allowed addltion- al compensation of not less than One Hun- dred Dollars ($100) per annum, and not more than Three Hundred Dollars ($300) per an- num, which shall be paid in twelve (12) equal installments out of FLitherthe gen- oral fund or the jury fund of such county, such additional compensation to be fixed by the Commissioners Court of such county." Hon. John C, Marburger - Page 2 (v-326) The 22nd Judicial District is composed of five counties, namely: Austin, Rays, Caldwell, Fayette, and Comal. The combined population of said district is 99,- 193 as reflected by the last preceding Federal Census. The civil and criminal jurisdiction of the County Court of Coma1 County has been transferred to the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Court of said county by the Acts of the 18th Legislature, March 16, 1883, chapter 35, p. 24. See Art. 1970-310, V. C. 9. In view of the foregoing and the plain and un- ambiguous language in Art. 5139, supra, you are respect- fully advised that it is the opinion of this Department that Fayette County falls within the provisions of said Act upon its effective date, which is ninety days after date of adjournment of the 50th Legislature. That date is September 5, 1947. We wish to point out, however, that inasmuch as you have not requested same, we are not passing upon the constitutionality of the Act; but we believe that the provision which allows the additional compensation to be paid out of the Jury Fund of such county comes within the holding in the case of Carrel v. Williams, 109 Tex. 155, 202 S.W. 504. SUMMARY Fayette County falls within the provi- sions of Art. 5139, TV.C. S., as amended by H. B. 257, Acts of the 50th Legislature, 1947,' which provides for a Juvenile Board in coun- ties, where said counties are within a Judi- cial District composed of five or more coun- ties, where said District has a combined pop- ulation of more than 35,000 inhabitants, and where in one or more of such counties the civil and criminal jurisdiction has been transferred to the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Court. Yours very truly ATTORRRYGERRRALOF TEUS &I& -g&l 33A:jt;djm