Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

R-549 . nnmrm- OF ,-. “m B! Ibllr THEACTORNEYGENERA L AUSTIN. TEXAS PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEYGENERAL July 7, 1947 Hon. R. A. Taylor, Jr. Opinion No. v-297 County Attorney Zavala County Re: The vwet" or "dryv Crystal City, Texas status of Savala County; validity of local option elec- tion held in 1910 in said county. Dear Sir: __ Your letter -._. - of June ?, 1947, requests the oplmon of tms department as to the wet or "dry" status of Savala County and the validity of a local option election held on May 28,1910. The minutes of the Commissioners Courts do not disclose that the clerk was ordered to post election notices or that such notices were in fact posted. If it.1~ determined that such election was valid or that its validity can- not now be successfully questioned, it will not be necessary to answer your other questions. In order to determine the~"wet" or "dry" status of Zavala County, based on the local option election ,of 1910, It is necessary to go into the ques- tion of whether the validity of such election can be Inquired into at this late date. As stated in your letter, Article 5728,Revised Civil Statutes.(lgll), was enacted in 1907, as'an amendment to Article 3397 of the Revised Civil Statutes (1895). This Article was repealed by state-wide prohibition in 1919, but' its ovisions were re-enacted in the Liquor Control Act i"Art: 666-46~.;:V+.P.C.) effective September 1, 1937. Section 40a of Article 666, Vernon's Penal Code, and the Act of 1907 which became Article 5728of the Re- vised Civil Statutes (1911) are identical and each reads as follows: "At any time within thlrty'(30) days after the result of any local option elec- tion held pursuant to the provisions of the Texas Liquor Control Act has been declared, any qualified voter of the county, justice precinct or incorporated town or city of Hon. R. A. Wylor, Jr. - Page 2, V-297 such county in which such election has been held, may contest the said election In the District Court of the county In which such election has been held, which shall have original and exclusive juris- diction of all.sults to contest such election, and the proceedings in such oontest shall be conducted in the same manner, as now govern the contest of any general election, and said court shall have jurisdiction to try and determine all matters conuected with said election including the petition of such election and all proceedings and orders relating thereto, embracing final count and de- olaration and publication of the result putting local option Into effect, and it shall have authority to determine ques- tions relating to the legality and valld- ity of said election, and to determine whether by the action or want of action on the part of the offloers to whom was entrusted the control of snoh election, such a number of legal voters were denied the privilege of viAIn& as bad they been allowed to vote, might have maberially changed the result, and if it shall appear from the evidence that such lrregularltles existed in bringing about said election or In holding ssme, as to ‘Under the true re- sult of the election imposeibl6 to be ar-. rlv6d at or very dimbtful of ascertalnlng, the court shall adjudge such election to be void, and shall order the proper officer to order another election to be held, and shall cause a certified copy of such judgment and order of the court to be delivered to such officer upbn whom is’ devolved by law the duty of ordering such election. It is fur- ther provided that all such cases shall have precedence In the District Court and appellate courts and that the result of such contest shall finally settle all questions relating to the validity of said election, and it shall not be permissible to again oall the legality of said election in ques- tion In any other suit or proaeedlng; and provided further, that if no contest of Hon. Ri. A. Taylor, Jr. - Page 3, V-297 said election Is filed and proseouted In the manner and within the time provided above, it shall be conclusively presumed that said election as held and the result thereof de- clared, are in all respects valid and blnd- ing upon all courts; provided also that pending such contest the enforcement of lo- cal option law in such territory shall not be suspended, and that all laws snd parts of laws in conflict herewith be and the same are hereby repealed. "Any qualified voter of any county, justice precinct, incorporated city or town within the State which has heretofore voted on local option may contest said election under the provisions of this Act, and if ho contest is filed within sixty (60) days from the taking effect of this Act, It shall be conclusively presumed that said election as held was valid in all things and'binding upon all courts." In the case of Iiardy v. State, 107 9. W. 547, (decided January 29, 1908) our Court of Criminal Appeals construed Article 3397, as amended in 1907.: Th; s.;rl- lant took a bill of exceptions to the refus Court to allow him to prove by the county c Yerk that he (the clerk) did not:at any time post or cause to be post ed any noticesof the election. !Fhe Court, In passing upon the blll?_said:., ., "This prosecution was commenced on the 29th da{ of,July, 1907. The bill shows that the Sta e objected on the ground that it was immaterial,, and was offered in:.$he nature of a defense to contests the legalrty of the local option law at a time more than 60 days after the taking effect of the Act .of the Thirtieth Legislature, passed May 14', 1907, Laws 1907, p. 447, C. 8. 'We hold that this objection is well taken. Said Act provides that contests of elections that had thereto- fore been had must be contested within 60 days from taking effeot of said law, and not otherwise. The matters compialned of would be mere irregularities at best, and this Act ), makes valid and noncontestable .anythlng per- : taining to irregularltles In the adoption Hon. R. A. Taylor, Jr. - Page ‘r, V-297 of the looal option law. The act Itself provides that we shall oonolusively pre- sume that said election as held was valid in all things and binding upon all courts. We accordinglyhold that said Act is valid, and applies to all local option elections and It olearly applies in this case.’ The Court of Criminal Appeals has frequently had the same statute before it for oonstructlon and have unlSormly held that uuless a local option eleotlon was contested within the statutory time aiter the result of the election has been declared, the law conclusively presumes that the election as held and the result there- of declared are in all respects valid and binding on the court. See Branch’ s Annotated Penal Code, Sec. 1228, p. 682, for citation of earlier oases; Blaine v. State, 139 9. W. (26) 792; Grumbles v. State, 169 9. W. (26) 720; ex parte King, 160 9. W. (26) 255. In J&alne v. State; supra, the Court of Crimi- nal~Appeals of Texas, in oonstruing Article 5728, Re- vised Civil Statutes (Ml), used the Sollowing lsnguage: “Ihere is an attaok made upon the pro- ceedinga of the election whereby said jus- tice precinct 190. 7 OS Dallas County, Texas, was voted dry In 1890. This attack comes too late. This attack should have been made within alxty days after the talcing effect of B N 51 Chapter VIII OS the General &ws’of’ke 30th Legislature, First Called Session, p. 447, which became effective ninety days after May 14, 1907 fail which the law conclusively prekd%t thealectlon as held and the results as therein declared are in all respects valid and binding on the oourts. ’ (Emphasis ad&i) Copies of the prooeedings of the Comniasloners Court of Z&vale County pertaining to the local option electl.on of 1910, which you sent us, disolose that the statutes governing local option elections in effect at that time were Sully complied with in every respect, ex- cept there is no record showing there had been any post- of the notloes of such election as required by Articl $37 Revised Civil Statutes (18%) However, at the tim the &e&ion was ordered the amend&It to Article 3397, Revised Civil Statutes, (18%)~ Was in full force and ef- fect. We infer from your request that no contest of this Hon. R. A. Taylor, Jr. l. Page 5, V-297,. election was filed at any time.~ You are advised that it'is concluslvely~ pre- sumed that such notices were posted in the msnner and for the length of time prescribed by law and that the question of whether such notices were or were not so posted will not now be considered by the courts. You are further advised that Zavala County was a' "dry area", as that term is defined in Section 23, Article 666, Vernon's Penal Code, from the time the local option election of 1910 prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquors in that county became effective, until It became legal to sell therein 3.2 per cent beer by weight as a result of a local option election held in 1933 for that purpbse. Since that time it has been a "dry area" only as .to the sale of whiskey and other alcoholic beverages,~containlng more than 3.2 per cent alcohol by Weight. Tillers~on v. State, 159 S.W. (2d) 502. SUMMARY The question of whether notices of a local option election held In 1910 were or were not posted in the manper and for the length of time provided by statute, the election not having been contested'wlthln the statutory period after the reault of the election'was declared by the.Commis- sYoners' Court, will not be considered by the'courts, but will be conclusively pre- sumed that such notices were duly and regu- larly posted as required bg'law. Article 3397, Revised Civil Statutes (1895)as '~ zt;d by the Thirtieth Leglslature~ (1907) . . From the time the local option elec- 'tion of 1910 became effective in Zavala County until the sale of 3.2 per cent beer by weight was legalited by the local option election In 1933, that county was a "dry arean as that term is defined by Section 23, Article 666, Vernon's Penal Code. Since that time, the county has been a "dry area" only as to the sale of whiskey and other alcoholic beverages containing more than Hon. R. A. Taylor, Jr. - Page 6, V-29!& 3.2 per cent aloohol by weight. Tillereon v. State, 143 Tex. Ct. Rep. 473, 159 S. W. ,;,(26) 502. Yours very truly ATTORREYGEZEBA.LOF TEXAS By wA=dd8%f- William 9. Lott WSL:rt;djm Assistant