Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

AUCITIN 1s. Texan PRICE DANIEL ATTORNEYGENERAL Jme'30. 1947 Hon. James F. Houllhan Opinion No. V-205 County Auditor. Orimge County Re: Necessity for County Com- Orfinge,Texas ‘d . mLss$cnera to obtain rsqui- aftiona and to advertise for bids on purchases of materials or supplies costing over $1.50.00. Dear Sir: We refer to your letter of May 23, 1947, in which you requested an opjnion of this Department, and in which you asked the following questions: "1. Is the Auditor authorized to approve for payment a claim against the,county for material or auppllea where no requisition was made for the purchase of same,'where no r.equiaitionfor the pur- . chase of ssme wax approved by the County Judge, and I., . . where no copy of.such requisition for purchase of xame ha$'been"filed with ttie"Auditor?"' . "2. Is the Auditor authorized to approve a claim against the County.for payment for equipment, material, or.aupplles coatlng.in excess of one hundred fifty and no/lOO. ($150.00) dollars where said equipment, mater- lal,:or supplies were purchased without competitive bids? "3. Ia.the County Clerk authorized to Issue a warrant in payment of a claim which.hax not been approved for payment by the Audltor? "4. Is the Cbunty Treasurer authorized to pay a warrant issued by a :County Clerk,in payment of a claim that has not been approved for payment by the Auditor?" Orange County officers are on a,aalary basis; hence we shall quote.only those atatutjsaapplic&blp to such counties. We are assuming that the purohaseb referred to In our request are to be made under statutes other than Articles 2356 bhrough 2367, inclusive, since these 'statutescontemplate the Commissioners' court making the purchases of those things listed therein and submitting the same to competitive bids at least every two years, . . , Hon. James F. Houlihan, Page 2, V-285 and'our remarks will be confined to those purchases made under provisions other than those last mentioned. Subsection (b) of Article 3899, V.C.S., provides that each officer named in the Act who receives a salary, shall be per- mitted to make DurchSSeX or charge to his county all reasonable expenses necesaarg~ln the legal conduct of his office, and that such expenses be passed on by the Commlsslonera~ Court once each month for the ensuing month, upon the appllcatlon.of each officer, stating the kind, probable amount nf expenditure, and the necea- slty for such expense, together with the endorsement of the County Auditor, before such Commissioners' Court shall allow the same. Articles 1658, 159, 1660, and 1661, V.G.S., are as follows: *Art. 1658 - Bids shallbe asked for all supplies of stationery, books, blanks, records, and other supplies for the various officers for which the county la re- quired to pay, and the purchase made from the lowest bldler, after filing said bid with the auditor for record. "Art. lh59 - Supplies of every kind, road and bridge material, or any other material, for the use of said county, or any of its officers, departments, or in- stitutions must be purchased on competitive bids, the contract to b,eawarded to the party who, in the judg- ment of the commissioners1 court, has submitted the lowest and beat bid. The county auditor shall ad- vertise for a period of two weeks in at lease one dally newspaper, published and circulated in the coun- ty, for such supplies and material according to specifications, giving in detail what la needed. Such advertisements shall state where the specifications are to be found, and shall give the time and place for receiving such bids. All .auchcompetitive bids shall be kept on file by the county auditor ax a part of the records of his office, and shall be subject to lnspec- tlon by any one desiring to see them. Copies of all bids received shall be furnished by the-county auditor to the county judge and to the commissioners court; and when the bids received are not satisfactory to the said judge or county commissioners, the auditor shall reject aaid bids and readvertiae for new bids. In aases of emergency, purchases not in excess of one hundred and fifty dollars may be made upon requisition to be approved by the commissioners court, without advertlls- lng for competitive bids. Eon. James F. Houlihan, Page 3, v-285 "Art. 1660 - All Claims, bills and accounts against the county must be filed in ample time for the auditor to examine and approve same before the meet- ings of the commlsalonera~ court. No claim. bill or account shall be allowed or paid until it has been examined and approved by the county auditor. Th auditor shall examine the same and stamp his asoval %hereon. ‘TS he deems It necessary, all such aca.qunts,. bills, or claims m&t be verified by affidavit touch- ing the correctness of the same. The auditor la here- by authorized to administer oaths for the purposes of this law. roved intriplicate by the said officers/the triplicate to remain with the officer desiring the purchase, the duplicate to be filed with the county auditor, and the original to be delivered to the party from whom said ourchase is to be made before am purchase ahall'ie made. All warrants on the co&g treasurer, except warrants for jury service..must be countersigned by the county auditor." (Emphasis ours) Article 2368a, as amended by the 50th Legislature and which became affective May 3, 1947, now provides that no Commissioners' Court shall make a contract calling for or requiring the axpenditure or payment of $2000 or more out of any fund or fundsof any county or subdivision of any county without first submitting such proposed contract to competitive bids; providing for advertising in a newspaper and excepting only counties with a population of more than 350,000. In the case of Wyatt Metal & Boiler dorks v. Fannin County, 111 9-W. (26) 787, where the county had purchased.culverts from the plaintiff in the amount of #ll,OOO and used them in the public roads of Fannin County, Art, 1659, V.C.S., had not been complied rlth and therefore the County Auditor would not approve said claim. The plaintiff sought a mandamus to compel the County Auditor to approve the same. The Court, through Justice Wlliams, in denying the mandamus, had this to say: "It is clear that from the passage of these lota it was the intent of tha Legislature to declare a public Eon. James F. Houllhan, fage 4, v-285 policy. That such a policy is wise is evidenced by the universality of such statutes found in the laws of Congress and of all the state Leglalaturer. . . "Under.the record, plaintiff was relegated to a suit against the county upon an Implied contract for the reasonable value of the beneflta which b'anninCounty received .from the use of theso oulvsrts." In thee ase of Patten v. Conch0 Coi.nty,196 S.-i. (26) 833,the Court held that Article 2368a did not,provlde for.~competltlve bids for road machinery purchased by a county nor was there any other statute requiring the same. It ~111 be noted, however, that Article 2368a (a) as amended1by the 50th Leglrlature, supra, nor'orovides for cornetitlve bids1for road machinery if such purchase amounts to g 2,000 or more. In view of the foregoing statutes and cases, you are respect- fully advised that questions Nos. 1 and 2 are answered in the negative, except when the equipment purchased by the county be that of road mach:nery, then, in view of Art. .?368a, and the case of Patten v. Conch0 County supra, if such purchase of machinery is less than $2,000, the Auditor need not require a requisition nor competitive bids before approving said claim. It is clearly apparent under Articles 1660 and 1661, supra, that the County Clerk is not authorized to issue a warrant in payment of a claim which has not been approved by.the Auditor, except for jury service. Since Article 1661, supra, provides that all claims .must be approved by the Auditor, and further that all warrants on the County Treasurer, except warrants for jury service, must be countersigned by the County Auditor, your last question is also answered in the negative. SUWWARY The County Auditor la not authorized to approve a claim against the county for material or supplies where no requlalton is had: nor la he authorized to approve a claim for equipment, material or supplies in excess of $150 where such purchase Is not made on competitive bids (Wyatt &tal,& Boiler diorksv. Fanning County, 111 S.W. (26) '787, Art. l&9, V.C.S.) except for the purchase of road machinery in amounts less than #2000.00. Art. 2368a, V.C.S. - The County Clerk is not authorized to lzsuo a warrant Eon. Jamea F. Houllhan, Page 9, v-285 in lyment o r a claim which ha8 not beeu approved by e he Auditoraxcspt warrants for Jury 8ervloe. nor ir the County Ti+earursr authorized to pay a rarr8&t in payment. of. a olalm that h,ar~nbt been approved by the Auditor. Artiolam 1660 and ,161, V.C.S. .- Vary truly JOur8, ATTOFi2SY OEI?BUL OF TZCM sp’BFUOi Aii~n. . . BY’ Bruor Allon Asrirtph ”