136
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
GROVERSELLERS
*TTORNEIGSNLRAL
~~odable Gibb Qilobrimt, Presideat
&rionY turd and YeobanSoal Cal legs oi Tu8m
COllSge BkCion, tua*
mar Yr. Gil ahrirtr
tbr ~peola’l levee t8s
iot to pay naid lwndr)
la Burlomon County XXI- ’
1861, addreosed to Honorable
ller of the Vnlrerni ty of Texms, ap-
0, we held that property conveyed to
or the ume and benefit ni the ~nlter-
pt from 811 tuer- Te thjnk this
to the quentiim you mtmlt, and that
IS exempt from the payrent of mid tax
to t.he Rurles ntj Jmpror9Pl~t nlstrlet YO. 1. Te en-
Clone herewith II CODJ of Rafd opfnjon.
Xo addition to the authorjtier cited In the 8hore
opinion, we 0~11 your attention to an o~inlm wrgtten by the
Ctwrt of Cjrll Appeals in the ease of Lowr Colorado River
Authority v. Chemical Bank & Trust Company, 18R 6. ‘1. (2)
401, In shlch the Court of Clril Appeal I held that the Lower
Colnraln River Authority was exempt from the pawent of all
tnxea on Its property r?-ich Is used for xorenment.al pur-
poses.
lmor8blr Glbb Gllohri~t - page 2
Thl8 1K)?nln~, Ootober 31rt., the Supreme Court lf-
firred the fudpnent of’ the Court af Civil Appea111.
It Id tbemfere our opinion that the Aglaul tural
& Yeo b 8nlrCellem
8I lo lampt tr a m tb o p a ymmt o fta x 0
to
0
tie Burlooom Oomtl Improbmetat Dlmtrlet )lo+ 1.