Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable A. C. Foster County Attorney Haskell-County Haskell, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-6754 Re: County Clerk's lssulng marrfage licenses to members of armed forces without charging pre- scribed fee. We are in receipt of your letter of recent date re- questing the opinion of this department on the above stated intitter.We are also in recei.ptof your excellent brief, which has been of material assFstance in our consideration of this matter. We quote from your letter as follows: "Is It legal for the County Clerk to remit fees due the clerk for issuing marriage licenses to members of the armed forces, or in other words may the clerk issue marriage licenses free of charge to the members of the armed forces, and not account for such fees in the Clerk's annual report of fees of office?" The statutory provisions pertinent to your Inquiry are: Article 1970, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, which, in part, provides: "Clerks of the county court shall receive the following fees: . . . . Issuing and recording marriage license . . . . 1.00 . . . . (I Article 3896, V. A. C. S., which provides: "Each district, county and precinct officer . . Hon. A. C. Foster, page 2 O-6754 shall keep a correct statement of all fees earned by him and all sums coming into his hands as deposits for costs, together with all trust fund~s placed Inthe registry of the court, fees of of- fice and commissions in a book or in books to be provided him for that purpose, Fn which the of- flc'er,at the time when such deposits--aremade or such fees and commissions are'earned and when any or all of sudh funds shall come intd~hls hands, shall enter the same; and Ft shall be the duty of the county auditor in counties having a county auditor to annually examine the books and accounts of such officers and to report his fIndIngs to the next succeeding grand jury or district court. In counties having no county auditor, it shall be the duty of the (35mmissioners1Court to make the ex- amTnatlon of said books and accounts or have the same made and to make report to the grand jury as hereinabove provided." Article 1897, V. A. C. S., which provides: "Each district, county and precinct officer at'the close of each fiscal year (December 3lstj shall make to thendistrict court of the county ?.n which he'resfdes a sworn statement in triplicate (on formsdesigned and approved by the State AudLtor) a copy of which statement shall be for- warded'~to~theState.Auditor by the clerk of the d~%strFctcourt of said county within thirty (30). dags after the same has been filed in his office, and one copy to be ffled with the county auditor, lf any; otherwise said copy shall be filed with the Commissioners' Court. Said report shall show the amount of all fees, commissions and compensa- tions whatever earned by said officer during the fiscal year; and secondly, shall show the amount of fees, commissions and compensations collected by him during the fiscal year; thlrdlg, said report shallcontaln an itemized statement of all fees, commlsslons and compensations earned during the fiscal year which were not collected, together with the name of the party owing said fees. com- mlsslons and compensations. Said report shall be filed not later than February 1st following the close of the fiscal year and for each day after said date that said report remains not filed, said of- fLc,ershall be liable to a penalty of Twenty-Five ($25.00) Dollars, which may be recovered by the county in a suit brought for such purposes, and Tn Hon. A, C. Foster, page 3 o-6754 addition said officer shall be subject to removal from offlce." Article 102, Vernon's Annotated Penal Code, which provides: "Any county officer or any district attorney to whom fees or costs are allowed by law who shall fail to charge up the fees or costs that may be due under existing laws, or who shall remit any fee that may be due under the laws, orwho shall fail to make the report required by law, OP who shall pay his deputy, clerk or assistant a less sum than specified in his sworn stat'ement,OP receive back as a rebate any part of the compensation allowed such aepu%y, clerk or assistant, shall be flned not less than twenty-five nor more than five hundred dollars. Rach act for- bidden by this article is a separate offense," Also, we call your attention to the following language of Section 28, Article 1, Constitution of Texas: "No power of suspending laws shall be exercised except by the Legisla- ture." Although the Legislature has power to suspend OP amend existing statutory law in order to meet changfng conditions, wee are unable to find any legislative enactment which exempts the members of the armed forces from the payment of the fee prescribed in Article 3930 fop issuing and recording marriage licenses, and we find no provision exempting the county clerks from those provisions requiring said officers to charge up the fee that may be due under the law for said service and forbids them to remit any fee that may be due for such ser- vice under the law, or which exempts said clerks from keeping the accounts and making the sworn statemen% required by Arti- cles 3896 and 3897 (supra). In this connection see Russell v. Cordwent, 152 S, Wa 239). In view of the foregoing, it is the opinion of this department that the County Clerk of Haskell County is without power to waive or remit the prescribed fee for issufng and recording marrlage licenses for members of the armed forces. It is our further opinion that such fees should be accounted for and reported in conformity with the provisions of Articles 3896 and 3897, and that failure to charge up such fees when due or the remission of same would be In violation of the provisions of Article 102 of the Penal Code, We trust that the foregoing satisfactorily answers you~ inquiry. Hon. A. C. Foster, page 4 O-6754 Yours very truly, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/J. A. Ellis J. A. Ellis Assistant JAE:LJ:wc APPROVED AUG 4, 1946 s/Ocie Speer (Acting) ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Approved Opinion Committee By s/BWB Chairman