Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

638 Art&o10 SO9 (the geremt st8tate) manfhtorll~ reqalres the 80oumlstlon of a surplus to ths ppO(Otef riitp pc 04ut or the bank's orpita #teak, 1~ dsalarss that 'said sorplos &all not bs ospt Sor the paymat of lowe which auy eaenr,' It follows ewm thi8 the bank would in no sra& - tit-h or without the ooasent of ths BurLiaq Qoads&oac - bs uathorlSel to dlaidnisb aa arioting:surplus (Mxish doss not sxoeed fiStf psr 0-t of Ito~Oapital @took) for the purpose of LnCrsasing its oapltal *took. In the next plaoe, shils Artiels 1, Chaptsr VI, OS the BankIng code (not ret ufeotire) makes some Impor- tant Ohangm in rSspSCt ts surplus, it dose not mthorlae theuse of oertifled surpltu bfthebank,s~enrith the oonsentot theB8nU~Comds~oner,?or tbepurps8s ef' lxuwead~ tge -pita1 8toek of the bank, where me ~~~+xoeed thq ~auiros~en~ ef the #state. This Arfiols, like Ifs pfsdsOesssr, (Irtiole soo) audatOr1~ rSqUir88 ths OrslrflOn OC 8a 8SOount to be known as 8urplu8, a part of shieh may from time to time be oerti- fled, r&i rhall be known 88 sCertiflod surplt18~. Unliks the parent statute, this statute r sq u ir o s l oontiaums buihUngup of 8urplu8Nifsre the paymmtot the dltiends until thheSUXXI knorrm88 the 04bt'tifiti rrPp1U8 sqrmls the saplkl ef the bank. It ftlrthermors8)scui0al1~ lidfs th8 pUrpO8e of the aertifled surplur tS absorbing slO8ae8 in eM088 o?und.tvided gu-oflts axltuloartitie4surplrrs~, ~hloh itares are flmt to bd usal ior suoh purpose before resort ~to the oertifled surplus. An CL parentambigultp in the ~statute ulses fro8 the language,.P such gertified 8WD lam w not be - r42qp!il XUUUltL*C--?f frpd9it!d&W~. %8 ambi&ty is Only 8pparWt. ODO OUI mot OOMtntO the last-quoted 18.ng~4e as autborlaing the beak upon the writ- ten ooasent of the Co5uil8siorrer, to ruluoe an misting asr- titial surpla8 below the minima requiramt of the st8tute - that la, a sum equal to the aopltal. That would be to des- frq in Off-t the 8tatllteei OSI'tifiSd 8Ul’p1R8 it8elf, and thus make the olause repugaant to the paramount re- quircPPentof the tegisloture~ Rsther, we thiajf,the dis- orebion here given to the dlreatsrs and the8an)riry;Cem- missioner pertains to that part of the osrtlflsd surplus 639 a u a h l o o nstr u o tiu n 1 8 a c e8som8lsudldr one, and does not lead to 813abma~d ooadmqumoe nor that-t In asty SIMSWO the alear legislrtite-8S to require an adequate lllrpllM. %'~stil&thatThatTShWS saidtill 8StiSfSStor- ily ens~ar your inquiry, we are