.
OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
e-ahum
---
f?ononble 0. C. &rear
Taxam Bighuay Engineer
Terao ‘El&way Deportment
Austin, %xar
Deer 9I.r~
he14 ia the
r Daparteent .
be 16~1 of hprn,
you in~-oonMoUon
o the Sate Treemarer.
wAgpfioation 90. 248Ui'
JiltIl.CLAW Pi AL.,
Responl9elltr,
Honorable D. 0. Cr6or. i’ag6 2
The abcue-m@&mred snd 6utitled cppllcet ion6
for wplta of error were fllsd in the u6ua6 of
Ztotr et al. V. Class et al;, iJo. 11641, in the
Court of Civil Appeals at OolVoeton. The opinion
of the Court of Civil Qp6616 Ia r6pDrt6d In 167
9.J. (26) 296, end wo refer to that oplnlou for
l full 6t&tem4nt of the foot6 and iaeu66 involved.
l3eretorore. on February 17, 1943, we *Refucsrd ror
Bat of !Xerlt* botE oi the above ar:rllostlotm.
..-
It .fr now o~rred tbst t ts order8 atma lnC1oated
be, an& the atme am hereby, smt bsld6, %nd that
both Of a’e$d %~~liO%thXl6 be Refwed.
O&nlon d6Uvrrsd
April 21, 1903.”
The ~upremo Court, by Its order above quoted, has,
uncsr Rule of Prooadrlre 4a3, ag?rovod the prlnoipl66 or 16~
drolwed in the opinloo of the Court of Civil ?ppml.6, to t&o
0rr80t that your %epartmmti ha6 no iat~ereat in the f&a in-
&rod abut.
Ronorable D. C. Cirwm, Page 3
Id the 11;:ht or the changed order of tho %prme
Court, it Sollows, In our oplnlon, tka: the oheok6 aentloncd
by jrqu 6hould now be roturnod to the r66peotlve oollsotorr.
Yours Vary truly