Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AlTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Hon. oeotgm8. no8Qe Ooanty Attoraoy Y8. Eeaa OoMty Rlehmoa, Tmna WherelQ yea srqla v&other UT aot.m.re et BOBMbarg, Taxes date4. Qt~oas, 8Q4 88 above lrrliaatea, tern4 Oh. 8dloel La:born by 8he 8hareh 8ad 'Uharehooqt'e tibn.. The aahool Is .oot 8 riva8e 8oheol up1 lt,r8 ae8 .llmltulto O&ho- 1100 afone, mm4 there are laao ohildren of non-Catho- lie faith lttea4ia(l,the m-1. Xn thlm aohoal the ohildraa noeire 6e8enl l4asatlonal tralnlng s1rllnr to that taa@t ia the lta ta maintain@4 aohoola and in l66itioa thormto, they rea*iro religiow lnatructlon Hon. Oeorge 0. Ream, page 2. mnd al40 phyeloml development. The 8ohool la not a prlrote sohool, 06 above lndio a ta d, ld It ia not opemted for ?rorit. In one part of the sohool bulldIng, there ~111 be melntalnd a ahapol *~hlok nil1 bo trod rogalwly for rellgloum rornhlp by the ohlldnn in the sohool and the dhoroh oongrega- tlon and say other person ceslrlap to attend the rell,gloosservloem them." Art1010 2, seotlon 2 of our State Conatltutlonper- nits the leglolataraby 2enenl laro to lx o mpoertoio f proper- tier from taxation. The leglslstare, in eoaiorrlty 4th its luthorltr, lnaote6 Artlole TlbO V.A.d.2. aa4 ue quote the ap- plloable portion thereof as follewor *The follewisg property ahall bm exempt frar taxation, to-ritr 1. 2abooia and Oharohoa.-Pablie#&sol housea and letaal places ef rellglous rorshl), also any pro- perty orrud by a lhuroh or by a ltrlotly nlI~loas loalety, ior the lrola8Ire we as l &welling plaoo for the .dnIotsrs of suoh eharoh or religiooclmoiety, the books 4b8a.mata~e uiorefn 0tia the grewi attaohed to ocroh.balUIngs nooessary Ser the prhper oooupuo~, ase al enjoyneat of the sat+, uu¶ uhieh field8 M) revenue wlutewer to oaoh ohruoh or roll~lour eoeiety; provldd that sash ezeaptioa as to the eelllng plaaa for the dnlsfero shall not extend to - wweW thmn 1s reasonably neoeesazy for a awe1 "rlag pl8oe end In ao event aore thon one lora of land. All 9abllo oollyrr, 9ablId lsaaadu, ana all endonent iaatls oi in8titationm or 1uraIag and rdlglea not uned ulth l TIU ti,9xWlt. sna when the mm8 are intaetwl la beads or mtiga@8, aDa all mash buildlng~ ti0ea lxoluslvel~ ana ownd by 9enoas or lsooeLatlonsoi peroons for lohool purapesesl....* Clearly the property la qaeatioa 18 tax exwpt unlemr It ba deolded that the use ot the oha ll for rrll#loaa exerelsea, la addition to the we of the eat Pre building for noboo purposes, destroys the exam tlon. The bullding if ased exoludtely for either ptapoae mm Pd bo tax lxupt an4 we me not prepare6 to hold that the eoaourrence of the two exempt use8 render8 tha property lloble to taxation. It la, therefore, our opinion that the property Hon. Oeorge 0. Wane, page 2. ruoh 1~ the subjeot of your laqulry is tax exempt. Yours very trnl7 hTTOl3mtvOrnIl. O? m roodror 2auardo *0m10taat