Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICEOFTHEATTORNEY GENERALOFTEXAS AUSTIN &mrahle J., D. Looney oount y ,Auditor pewi OouAty Boston, Texas Oplnfon Ho. 0. Ee have your favor 0 9, requestlq aA opinion on the above satter, eing as Sollowar this oSSio8 at o? this County 00rdea S- 30 ehou that tbs 6OOa OA tb3 moora while seal was aa- tually on the roper mh0a 0f aeal to this rea- 8 8asl be added t0 uld the deed be reaorded eord8d should 8 See be eiwr&wb person riling the am or word the deed gratis to oor- uutg Clerks apparent error. The general rule is that %n oSSloer may aorreot mistakes In his offiolal reoorda, on proper showing@, 36 Tex. Jur., .8so. 10, p. 407; but 'we fail to find any statute or deelslon authoriqing a Bounty clerk to oorreot a mistake ma&e by a forner oounty olerk some thirty or iorty years ago, Iionorable J. D. Looney, PEi&e2 It Is our opinion, therefore, that the present oountg 018x-k Would AOt be authorized to oorrast the reoord referred to by now showing that the notary’s seal appeared on said deeds. ‘Ye do not think that it is neoessary for said deede to be again recorded, slnoe It has been ect?erally held that the mre Sact that same have been heretofore reoorded Is evl- aenoe of the Sect that they were exeouted as provided for by law, and it would be presumed that the mtarg aiilxed the seal to lokncmledgtnente taken by him. 1 Tex. Jur., Sea. 78, pp. 4864; Alexander v. Houghton, 26 E. %. 1102. Further, under the provlalo~s of P.rtioles 3726 end 3726b, it lo our oplnlon that. said deeds would be as sffeative '%ltSout having said rea- orda oorreoted, or Bald deed& seain reoorded, as they wmld be if s-8 ware raoorded, slnae aald titlolss provide that where deeds have been OA reoor4 a8 long as tea years It ahall be no objaotlon to the admlsslon oi sam, or a oertifted aopp thereor, aa mldenoe th,at the of?leer taking the aoknowledg- mat or such instrunent harfng an ottfolal seal aid not aVflr the mm3 to the certirioate of aokmwledgment, or that the notarialseal le not showa OS record, It 1s our OpiniCiA, ths?sf'ore,,that If the partlss lntsrastsd ln these deeda de- sire to ham same again reoorded they should pay the Seee requlrea thereror. Trusting this satisfactorily answers your Inquiry, we are Very truly youra ATTORNEY f3ZEtPAL08 TXXAS