OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN
I
a t0 'theDrCpOr6OIiOtN6ti6n Or .%6X e~ea t%66
lt~tatoain the earn6oi Glty ~.Xballaat. Caohran,Pair.
ADD.)166 5.W. 32,&6~66 L+IJ Mtdi
*ft ti'themlvataklml0 applloctblr bo a~&t~Ser
-UWD~iRJJ‘ptOD*tft ilOa htit%W thOir‘WhM M. UWD-
Uw la fouud to ulot lb ohall mt bw enlargsb by
6oMt8u0t1aa. og tha 6QaQtwf, it.ougm to tr8rlvo
I strlotootittuuWai~:fw Wm taaaoaablapromu 0%~
b What th a ltato h u $ruztbd io oxproa~ %6x 38ak
.intaudrb to grant at all, rod Oha unlua the 1VllW
lalimltedto therem tww of a0 atatutr,tr4 rw0t
wuld br utdndvl boroa-4 whet -8 aeath' IiCoolayM
Taxauca (3d a*) p* 3570 Yhla tulo &alnl# Ma& Oh68
the mtatuto mart 86 ?mk~r lfOaaU$, of, ir the 8wsttU6-
uwot $he iawbodl~obtitfl,
that thadoabO~tc8lbar*
rdvad in t~vw of tha hxlng pow6t axulbaalambthe
2 suthwlud, &%a%.Caa. 26 W.) 8 539;
~;%%tdR t. Uaweko;68 To& 698, f S.W.519.w
:,
.~..
i’
- . ..
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion