Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Elm OF TEXAS Honorable 0, P. Lockhart, Chairman Board of Insurance Commissioners Austin, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-4729 Re: Similarity of'names of insurance corporations and related 'matter. Your request for opinion has been received and care- -fullyconsidered by this department. We quote from your request as follows~ "The Old Texas Life Insurance Company of Waco, Texas, operates as a statewide mutual assessment life insurance association under the provisions of Article 4859 (f), Sections l-20 and 5068-i. The Texas Life Insurance Com- pany is operated as a legal reserve stock life Insurance company under the provisions of Chapter 3 of Title 78 ana is also located at Waco, Texas. It was incorporated in 1901 with the present name, The Texas Life Insurance Company has complained tothe Department that the similarity in names is causing confusion to the public and to its policyholders. "The Old Texas Life Insyance Company operated prior to 1940 as the aramount Life Insurance Company and was located in Dallas, Texas, On February 13, 1940, the Paramount Life Insurance Company changed its name to Old Texas Life Insurance Company by proper charter amendment accepted in this Department and filed with the Secretary of the State of Texas e On December 31, 1941, by proper char- ter amendment, the Old Texas Life Insurance Company moved Its home office to Waco, Texas, the amendment being accepted by this Depart- ment and filed in the office of the Secretary of the State of Texas, Since the company moved to Waco, the complaint has arisen which we previously mentioned. Honorable 0, P. Lockhart, page 2 O-4729 'Your opinion is requested as to whether or not under the provisions of Article 5068-l and particularly Section 3 and under the facts stated the Board of Insurance Commissioners has authority to refuse to issue.renewal certificate of authority to the Old Texas Life Insurance Company, if, after a hearing, the Board is convinced that the use of the name is confusing and misleading to the public." Section 3 of Article 5068-1, Vernon's Annotated Texas civil Statutes, reads as follows: "Sec. 3. Upon application for charter to do business in Texas the Board of Insurance Com- missioners may determine whether the name of the association would be confusing and mislead- ing to the public; if so, It may refuse the certi- ficate or charter, and prohibit the doing of bus- iness under the name. "Any amendment to the charter of an aaao- ciation operating under this Act, changing the name of ,the association, must be submitted to the Board of Insurance Commissioners for approval; and the charter of any association operating under this Act may not be amended to provide for chang- ing its name to a name that is determined by the Board of Insurance Commissioners to be confusing and misleading to the public." The case of Board of Insurance Cormmissionersv. Na- tional Aid Life, Tex. Civ. App., 73 S.W. (2d) 671, writ refused, holds: (quothg head notes of said case) "1 " Trade-marks and trade-names and unfair com- petition "Rule that equity will protect cqrporation in use of name applies 'where,subaequentcorporation attempts to use similar name to that of existing corporation, "2 . Trade-marks and trade-names and unfair corn-, petition "In absence of statute, administrative agency granting charters, articles of incorporation, 01" permits to carry on business will not permit use by subsequent corporation of name aimllar to or $0 near- ly like that of another aswould be likely to produce confusion. Honorable 0. P, Lockhart, page 3 O-4729 "3 . Corporations "Under statute authorizing refusal of permit to do business to domestic insurance corporation if name is 80 similar to existing corporation's as to be likely to mislead public, which provisions subsequently wasmade condition upon which foreign insurance corporations should be permitted to do business, Board of Insurance Commissioners haa power to refuse permit to'~foreign~insurancecor- poration where name similar to that'of another foreign corporation was likely to cause confusion (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 4700, 5068). "4o Corporations "Statute authorizing refusal of permit to do business to insurance corporation with name similar to 'any other insurance company' applied where permit had already been issued to foreign insurance corporation with similar name and which was then engaged in business (Rev. St. 1925, arts; 4700, 5068). "5 e Trade-marks and trade-names and unfair com- petition "There is an unlawful appropriation where one corporation appropriates and uses distinctive por- tion of another corporation's name. "6e Corporations ~"Name 'National Aid Life' held so similar to name 'National Aid Life Aaaociatl~as to justify Board of Insurance Commissioners in refusing permit to do business to the 'National Aid Life' on ground that similarity of names would be likely to mislead the public in that the distinctive portion of two names was identical (Rev. St. 1925, arts. 4700, 5068). "7rj Constitutional law "Statute authorizing Board of Insurance Com- missioners to refuse permit to do business to ln- surance corporation with name so similar to that of existing corporation as to be likely to mislead public held not unconstitutional as delegation of arbitrasower (Rev. St, 1925, arts. 4700, 5068)~" Honorable 0. P, Lockhart, page 4 O-4729 Under the authorities aited in opinion No. O-4173 of this department, a copy of which is enclosed herewith for your information, whic,h cites the case of Board of Insurance Commis- sioners v, National Aid Life, supra',it is our opinion that your question should be answered in the affirmative, and It la ao answered, However, before refusing to issue a renewal permit to said-company, we think it would be proper to give said'insuranbe company an opportunity to amend its charter In order to adopt a name acceptable to the Board which would not be confusing and misleading tothe public, Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TaS By s/ Wm. J. Fanning Wm. J,'Fanning Assistant WJF :GO:wc Enclosure APPROVED AUG 17, 1942 a/Grover Sellers FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL This Opinion Considered And Approved In Limited Conference