Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN, Eonorable Cieo. Y. Sheppard Comptroller of Fublio Amounts Austin, Te.xas marm.Sboppsrli: t for 6a opinion lature, sutbor- antin payment to a Special Mstrl8t aoornell prior to the ; for tucuaplo, acfar , Iares The rwar Distrlet snee has msde and filed proper 717 passed at the late regular session of the 48th LegislatuGe, insoPar as pertiaent to your inquiry, Is as followst *tMotlon 1. Thst any person holding a State ot Mstrlot oStioe in the &ate of Texas, whether as a meruber of the exeout.kTe lef#elatite QC ju&ioial de- psrtments, when oalled i WO.the sdU* s)BFtiue OS dther the Btste orlatlonalWvernamts,isheNby mnorablc Cieo. ii. ,Shepparii - pwe 2 tUlthOX'iS& t0 file tit& the ~OEQtrOller of EQbliO AOcOunts Of the State, a statement or certirioate ia writing, to tbe effeot tbat be waives tbe pay- meat of his salary or pay Or the emolument5 of bf5 said officedurini; the pe~i0d ofbie5dlitary se+ vice ond authmldnk; the paymmt of euab salary, pay or 5Inoluments of his office to any other per- son, who, under t&e provi5ioxm oi any law of t.bia State io ;rppolnted or eltwted to temporlrrily ml1 such oitil offioe dur%ng the abe8noe of euob ~?f$- oer,euchwaivr or assigmasmt toternrinatelmm- dlately upon the release or discbarge of 5aid of- fleea from wch SdliterJ serece. *see. 2. 8ush waimr or assignmsnt sballbs suiiiOi6nt authority ror the mmptrollsr or public AMouat5 of the state of sexa to isuae state w5r- raata an&to pay susb jsrscm so holding susb off%- osr'opssitisndlWnghloaImmselnmlliikzy ser- rioe out OS appropriatl0ns me by the Legislature ror such office. 'Sec. 3. The filing wlth the Oomptroller o? RlbLto acoountu of State or *exe8 the of errah waiver orameignmemtpr0vldedrerin tbiolicf shall'mmrb~eoastrued~auyuourt 0r a.0 State to be a remtgaatioa fmm hi5 off300 by the person eaterlag the ntulty 6mece of the state or Yational l3wsrmnsnts or that his office is ~a- ant by reason tberbof. Wee. 4. The Up0rtance of this leglslatioa and the fact that many 21&e aul Dletriat otiiaars or the state of Texas are enterhg tbe mllity semi00 or tme state azul or the united St&se, whose OW'%oes are tlllsd by sUb8titute5, e~mlss- ionero and special Judges amI Others, and tbat apedal appropriation to pay oacb petsons 90 fill- ing the offices of those in tbe ndlitarj servloe fe insufficient anri insdeguate and, further, it is impossible to aceuratel~ detsmlne or antloipate tbe amunte or 5uc.b apprepriati0n5, creates an eaer- gamy andan%mperatirepubfio neee5sit~ tbattbs Constitutional Bule reqmkrlng bills to be read 011 three several days in @+a& Bonse be onopended, and the said Rule15 hsrew raspended,and tbatth%s dot take effect from and a?Mr its passage, and at is so taMBted.* Obviously, this Act oontemplates tbat the war- rant to a Special District Judge, whether for salary or expensea, is to be paid frm the appropriation for Ms- triot Judges. Your inquiry is liudted to the matter of war- rauts in payrzeut 0r sontbly expense accOunt8. Tbe expenses allowed te a District Judge are pro- vided for in Article 0820 , of th0 Revisal Civil Statutes, as follows8 sAl1DistrietJudgee5 5 swbes engaged in tha disohsrge Of their effkcial duties in any county of this State otba than the oormty of their residsnce, shall be allarod their actual aud noeessary expeuses while actually engaged in the discharge oS socb tit&es, not to exoeed @.oo per day for hotel bills, aail Pot to exoeed 4 a mile rhea traveling w rallroad aud no I to exoaed 20# a mile wheu traveling hy private oouveyauoe, in going to sad returaing Prom tbe plaoe where such duties are disctlmrg~, traw3ling by the neasest praoti- cai route. 2uoh 5fflo5rs shall also roaeive the actual and necessary postage, tolerpaph arm telephone expenscls incurred by them in tbe actual disoharge or their duties.* DOS, uuder tbe provisions of gcotioa 1 of 8. B. Do. 717, above quoted, tho waiver by the absent Mstrict Judge, aud therefore the authority to pay the Special Ms- trict Judge, is limited t.O~.rthopaymnt of his salary or pay or the esoluuzents of' hio said office. St does not contemplate expenses whatsoever by the absent District Judge, Por hoer course till have inourred none. In our Opinion No. O-454$ addressed to pw, under date of hpril 20, lW2, no add3ed as iolloast ****. Cc find no law nor prsotslea or itcu of uppropriation bill providiug rsr pay- mmt by t&e State of traveling expouses to IfonoraBle (ieo. Si. Sheppard - page 4 Special Dfstriot Jut&%. In the abaenee of a law so providing, you are net wfhoEieed to issue warrants for the payment of traveling ex- penses of Special D&strict Judgee.n drticle 6#&21 OP the Revised Civil statutes oavers the subjed of salaries of apwial judges, but it contains no provieioa for expenses of any kind. Itern 14 of the current bienalal appropriation for the Jidioiary se&ion - Comptroller*s Department -- is as follomSt 'Spealal Dietriot Judges' salaries and regular District Judgeat expeusee ohm hold- ing court out ot their dIntrIot," $VSOO.~ for eimh fisoal yeor. Thle approprirtien, whatever my be the amming thereof with rospeet to expezmes, can not aheage the sltua- tioo, SOr it %s thoroughlysettled that aa appoprlatlen may not ~oeast.ltutiormlZy rithcl~n~money f'rarn the treamry In tho abseuee of a prf?vlously exietiq law wthoridng tho game. (Coast., Art. III, sets. 44) Incidentally, we crall yeur attention to the faot that the oorrespom.Ung approprirtfon ior~the foFthotmdng bienxdum in Item 6 is preeloelf the same as in the current appropriation. Tram what we have s&d it iollora that haLther k. ii. Bo. VI?, nor any other statute whlah we have been able to find, authoriz6m the ieouance of a varraut w you to pp9 expenses of a 8peaial Dfetriot Judge.