z OFFICE.OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
b ._ AUSTIN
OQALDc.MANN
firromn”
omm-
Tha WQ*~ of t4,eMl&mn In 8uohplaa.s wa.
Gxnating tbn, that
the 4gisfatrud was:
tie pln00s a06igd0d,
to hare boon used
84 m.&‘#on to the WQ~ by $-haphtpmrn6fkrtof
ik0080h00ttxt ia tih0O~SO 0r Ccwmmwsalth v. Riley, 97
a, E. $67 '.wheiwia 8 8Batlfir ststuta was ,undorotmetrw-
~:=*&I bs applisd In the.taterpr?tation OS tho ZW~J
lkarcltbs aourt said thatths wmd *employa
QI wed i;o;man ,"Bobare work" Q "to lpak.e~~wa t?fthe
80w06 0r af3.mw. lB Xooln8kY T, 0rc.lwsl1,11-Y. Y. -
(1 Kom) S909r.kheword ~8, sgtil>;defined a. ~fol1ow.t
Qbplatyme8~8 to two, as m Imtrummt or
&BS ar,.sir0eiag ILIP0bj.0ati .It~isaewora~ot
more '&arged slgniiioafion tban~tho word him.
A iiaahiriadto labop 18~emplotid but a lpanmay
be ‘em&oywS In wodr who Is not h&d;”
- ~r~~.ie3r18~c~r0~e.00~ op*t-slr~that thhslord wiiplof”’
a8 &180&i& drtiO~l.81573.'and1674, Peti h&O Of %WUB~
m0fuiettxm~a 30 iifm work, ortomki3 ueeoi-the semi.8
of ru&hoatrd hnd'that the wazd. "a&f alaa* inala an
appre&ios, a'warb,.or even oao*s cramaai or daughterI
Tim statutea rola: to OhIld laber:(&!tlolo.
i"f:
157S-157&i, Fomal ood.1 prohlb t.nothw wh.loh Is oxmIMed
in the statutee rela8ing to appmntioss~ *bat WM.0ii Is pro-
hlblfod by 8h0 Ohild 1abttC&W 4ipPlb38 witheqodl fOFo9 to
apprsntloe.*
In view of the80 obaorvcrtiam.It.I8 ths‘@ini-
or this dapmont, end yootz
.rs 80 advised, that there fs
no oonfiio$ bot~oea the &atutae re&atW&tild fbar
and those peaaittioa;the ap&W6ittiOingOf ldBO3!0.
Youu tary truly
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion