Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

. OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF - AUSTIN . . Bon3rablki R. D.' Strtiger . I county httopney Eall County Ilanphia, Texas Re: Do03 the failure ol' a holder of a drivcp's lfccnnao to m!ce the re- port of fan. accident ret- wired by Sea. 39, hrt. V, H.B. 20, 47th Log., render such holder sub- ject,to prooecution for e micdemxnor and subjeot to the penalty.p~~oscribed by So. 44 thhcrooC? ., We have @van due consldcrat.tion'to the question as propounded I.n your opinion request, and which is restSated.. cbovo i $ec$io:~ 39 of House D5.11 NC. 20 of the Regular-Ses- lion of' the+Borty-seventh Legislafure,'rcods as folloun: “Sec. 39. jrccidents to be reported by persons involved, "Every parson involved In an nocldent resulting in death, injtixy, or nppwont prop- orty dnrsge ol‘ 5'Sty Dull-am ($53) or more vhcrc one or n:oro motor vchl.clcs me involved and l:ho is the holder of nn opzrator's, com- mrcicl op2rotor10, or ohaufizur's liceilse, under the p~ovlolom of this Act, nhall I;!s::c a report of SUO~ sccldcnt to th.6 D$gnrt;li%%t Of Public Safety Vittiin forty-0lght ('!ii) hOLIP Hofuml to mkc such rcnort sh?Al rsndcr the y,onorabla Ii. D. strti~er, PcSe 2 c . .’ holder of such liconso liable to susponeion 1 or revocation of such license. Reports ro- ’ quirod by this Section shall be deened pri- vileged ccrmmications .’ :- . !. SectI.0; &Ii of aaid house Bill is the genord peaolty clnuse, and 16 .in the fol2owl~ 1anSuage: :.. d *:“$.3; . 44. Penalty for violation of Act. . d .. : . ” “(a) It shall be a mladexeanor for any person to violate any of the provisioim of thi3 Act’unless such violation is by this Act or other lows of ‘this State doolared to be n felony. . . ’ ’ ‘(b) In addition to any other pensltic~ ’ .hkreinbcPora ppovidod, and mleso another pen- ’. qlty is in this Aot or by tho laws of this State provided, every pera convicted of a niedeneanor for ths violatLon of nay provision of this Act. shall be punished bx f inenof not nor6 timn Two Hundred Dollars (@03). .. .- It’ is our opinion that the above quoted provisions of Ileuse Bf3.1 go. SO are mfYic&mt to constitute the failure of a holder’of a drlver’u license to report the specified .character of accident a penal. offense; and the Logiolaturo not hav1r.S. mado tlis smie a felony, and .not hav?.ng provided a specific penclty, t!lnt a vloZator shoul.8 be punished under the @mornI yrcd.3ion3 Of Section 44. Ve perceive no distinction from t!lo like situa- t:ono in mny .othor statutory, czmctments. with Sonora2 penalty ~lousec; for e::‘&mpl.o, tha Liquor Control. Act, Article 65641, vcrnonls Annotated Penal Code; VilcOxson vs. State, 134 Ye+. Cr. x. 583, 116 s, F!. (26) 4.34. Pourf3 vary truly . ~i?l’liclvm OCT$4 ].yal 4T’ory tmrE:nkb OF qAs