Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

RenexabloPeha D, Rfed, Ooml.alon.z, .~ 4he O-mny and the oentxoo4 be4w.o~ the aampr~‘. reprosonto- oonlrrsotaore mb.4 the npmeentet%rea~ same Ooagur~, bmm- by ax400 0t 4h0 wOtttiOn oa4erfn(l upOn the ~dutio. m, in $h? said wn- Co be auwexe& ~.a$&ier Thi ~rriktlan ‘1141~ cir.not 4&~“cip.+i#&+mplo~. :og ad& Ml.. u&de .4ha oun4x.atby hi8 'OMpany.18',o~red by the ON= #vlo 84 0md0 88~004~-0u4 ia the'a~,tute&above. lr e’:4 1h~ 4rla eliir ~ :th 4a hih l .e tit~tea doIi.4 :o x p r a a a ly iatk$ktLoa‘or orrid. iirpirriiti iUi& u@ core tanoblo lnol&d@'.the to tlad.la4he 84ofutoaa neoea8arybpl+o~t&oa~?h would s iwludo au* o~p~~t~io~. ~, ::_. .. -oration for'4he ooxvlooa thud pertwd.~m boh*lf Of.hia 00ap.n~from dopo.itapsid in by.the xepreaento4iveahe hlroa uh~gea in any roapQQt relo4lre to ths mo4ter~jhore~tiOr dia- ouaalon his relationtip .40hla'ooppony or hia ‘4a4- under the deflai4~oa;~~ &an In the 84a4u40. A Solu4ruotlea of the emplo~at..aIps4 8~404u4e uhlah reul6 bdaibhla supor- tt8.x wl4hln 4h6 4exynaet aueh Hatu48 would alao iP41tie oapoony whlgh h&OS 148 esployeea 4hreW 148 em tloa x. & U& Q o xlg e z llr Ed aw do 1 ~6 k4 liOWth a th t is ra the~lntentlma? th* L@tiOtm. ~~~t~e~ioro~a~(1t~yadfl~d~t~~ Q+%Q~o fOhlo do p ir o a rMnt ea tl 004f.w La tho oopooity deger&kd in yew fo4t6z&Ii ,148SnS~OSWSS would not OCR *Lth f 4sh0 p ~~+ea a o feex lr9lown4 annoy low. m lomx4uuu with yoke rowoat uo are ret- "OF" h r mr i44h her & lo wh tey ho u lno lea 8nd edwe 4 nu4 lkha top,~%‘tlnd4he ummr here6l~nto~auinqairy, u4iafaetoxy. .