OFFICE OF THE AY7’ORNEY GENERAL OF ‘TEXAS
AUSTIN
rianorrrble Stanley KulsvI.36:
County AttcWn8y
JM?:tt County
c u9ro , mxas
Defw six-1 opmar uo. 0-3!i67
Ret Wonld the gmWng of 1u1
easaleent, as otnltmated
vitb the sale of land, by
8 C~S@iOlMBP t0 th8 OO\pltJ
ior, atate ht$hlmy purposes
ooastitnte a OFIJ&~M offense?
Ye\u. reqnest ?or aa oplaim at this densrat trppcn
the above stated qtmat%aa haa boea waelvad. If6 quote from
your lettw 48 f&.larr
Honorable Stwley Kulavik, Page 4
Ia the ease of Bland vu. state, 38 s. u. 29, zti
VB~ held that a oounty offlalal may be removed from office
fw of'fla~ alroanduot, thou& he baa not been oc.uvioted
on sn indictment fop the offense alleged as gmueds for
ranoval.
Zp tieV Of the io~e~oin 8UthOF’it%O8 and the above
ststed faOts YOu -9 r88mttul f 7 rdtised t&t it i8 the
oplnldaorthi8 de~trartthrt~sbove~tl~trens-
rotlbn violrter Article 373, vernoats Annotated Penal Code,
md thrt 8ald b6nSWtica %8 void. It la our f'urthes opla-
ion that the soneg paid to the said oaanni8sloneo vw Ule@l-
ly paid to him and that it lm Ur duty urder &t&ale a340,
8Upn, t0 PtAy OV’W t0 hi8 ~OOUZkty til such mCUiOy ille@ily
roaeivedbyhLn*
with I'OfUl'Wk438 t0 ,tk8 19@ pPOO8dW8 t0 b8 fb~bW-
ed,afterthe ar8eamntdtmd ha8 beanre~eord#dandpoidfcw,
38 8 atter to be determlnad by the eoloLc88ione~8* court.
This depee8tent cPanot mske rugfpstions vith rsierenoe to
the 8W.
'i'l'Wt~ttitth0 fOPOgOing~~8ZUWOl'8 JrollP $IA-
@wP, ire -
YOUl'8 very truly
AT!P0mx!f oE!lmu OP TlaAS
m
Asdell Willl8ms
As8%8tsUt
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion