Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE AWORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Derr Sir: ue- the’ 8herlft ner in a for- nloa of thle depa~rtlaent, en re001reu. fee la the ulljr requeetedr ty, working with a honor In a foreign laoe o? arrest in the ~8 sherlri eerv8e the rieoner to hle Jail. ge fee lo due the sheriff RII gro- e 1030 and 1032 CCH” a Ranger from Da11~1 oonveyed one 2,cart.y00~1 DaUqe to #inoral We116, Texas, where he wwa aet by a~Ranger froaz Fleher County traveling in hla oar aocomanied by L aomtmble or deputy @herif.’ of Fisher County m& the party in ou@ad 0r the Ranger from Dallee was placed in the ouetody of the L r and Conrteblo or Deputy Sheriff from Fisher County who aonveyed him to the aaunt Jail o? e&id county. The eeoond traneaotloa vae identioal wit) Honorable tieorge R. ShepTard. Page 2 the first with the exmptlon t&t the Ranger from Dallas oon- veyed the seoond party to Breokenridge, Texas, where he was pla.ceU ln custody of the Ranger and oonetable or Deputy Sheriff of Fisher County, who took him to the oounty jell of Fleher county. You further state that no queatlon regarding ieee for eervlng crlmlnal prooese or aaklng an arreet lr involved In thle reqll)st, but the only question Involved 15 what mlleage fee, If any, le due the eheritf, his deputy or the constable of Fisher County aacompanying the State RAnger under the facts above stated. Artlole 1030, Code of Crlmlns.1 Frocedure, euthorlzee and provides aertain fees ror sheriffs and oonetebles perform- ing the vsrloue duties enumerated therein. Artiole 1032, Code of Crtilnal Procedure, provides : “A rrherlff ehall nijt charge fees for arreate made by Bangers, or mlleage for prl8onera trene- ported by Rangera, or mileage or other feca for tranrportlng a witness under attaohment leeued from another county unless euoh wltnees refuses to give bill for his offense, or files an a??ld,evit with such sheriff of his inability to glve ball.* Statutes preocrlbing fees for publlo officers are etrlatly aonstrued; henoe a right to fees may not rest by IBW pllcetion. Where this right la left to oonstructlon the lang- uage of the law muet be aunatrued In favor of the government. Where a statute la oapable of two oonetruatlons, one of whloh would give an offloer oompenea~tion for hie eervlaee in addition to his salary and the other not, the latter construotlon should be adonted. See the oaaee of HcCalla VB. City of Rookdale, 246 S.W. 064; Eastland County vs. %x81, 288 S.W. 518; Madden vs. Hardy, 50 8.X. 926. The State Bangers are oompeneated by the state on a salary bee18 and are not entltled to any ?ee in eddltion to their ealery for the performance OS the mervlaee above mentioned. In view of the foregoing authorities and under the above stated facts- you are reepeotfully advised the-t It 1s the opinion of this department that the Sherlif or his deputy or the Constable, em the oaae may be, who was aodompanylng the ,P,, Honorable George H. Sheppard. Page 3 ,, _ Ranger on the above mentioned tripe 18 not entitled to any mlle- age feee whatooever. Truetlng that the foregoing fully answers your in- quiry, we are Pours very truly ATTORXEYGEEKkX%OF TEXAS BY Ardell Willlame AW:db Aeslstant APPROVED JAM 8, 1941 Gerald 0. Mann /s/a/ ATTORWEY f3EMElU.L OF TEXA8 WJF APPROVED OPINION CONMITTEE By BWB Chairman