Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

458 OFFICE OF THE A’ITORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AU&IN I 1IOaofBbl@E. Y. CuMingham County Auditor Navarr0 CCunty ,/i&l opt&p l & iti6ato a r&inti of thi8 Depart- hae bean raceivmL wlaiag the sleotloa**I that beer ti thir COUUty‘cw bnVb hWl Id- lp hO th b s SO1 a tbObr,4 0r eourae, What 1 woa~4 likb to klww aow iis: Are those operatorswhose lfoenssrr wore eutoaetiaa~y canoallbd by t&b eleotlonentitledto a rsrund for thqir unex- pired tern and if 50 era they refua4eU out of tbb geasralfund of the Gouaty?* 459 8onorable2. Y. Cunningham, Pa&o 2 Article 067-3, Vernon*e knrrotatedPenal Code, aeta forth the amount of the annual 1iOanae fees required for the vnrious liaenrer napleatherein. Earacreph e or Article 607-3, aupra, provider: Wm aommiuoicx4re~ oourt in baah oounty of thia State shell b~ve tho LOWIC, except aa horein othbrsiae provldaaBR to wmporary liosnsr,to ltm and colleot fro% every psrso?.lloanaea hereundcr'in SPI& oounty a license fro bgual to one-hellof thn statb fob2 61naany inoorporate4 oity or town wherein the liaenaee 15 aaai0m4 shall have the powrr to levy and aolleot a liasa~e roe not to erooea one- half of the State fe4, but no other foe or tef ahall be levied by either. Nothinghera:n omteined shall bs oonatruad ae praventilu:ths levying, Laaaesaing, and oolleotlng of ganaral ad valoremtame oc tbo property0f ~iiy pebon llaenae4 to eel1 beer.- Art1010667-18, Vernon*6 Annotated Panal coae, reada a6 f0ii0ws t *In all OAZIQ~whore any parson pursuing the oo- cupatfon _- of selling _ _ beef, ns herein dbfinod,unaer llcbnas laauod In ~acmdmoe with the lawa at thie State, ha8 bs6n or ahall hereafter be prevented from ouoh cccuprJtionfor ths full time to which pureutlta@, he wculd bs otherwise entitled, by reaatonof the adogtion of local option i3 my county or subdirlsion thereof, the proporticnate emunt of licwm~ f44s PAia So muah of the prccaede 60 dmrlrod unasr the provIi?Inns cf thia Artlalsak %&P be neaaaeflry.not to kxacsad two (2) per cent thereof,-are bareby ajbropriated for that purpose.* For the purponetinf this opiafon we esauua that the 0omsJesfonsr~~ oourt in xk~vflrro County lavieb a04 oolleat44 from every person.licenaea in fda oounty B Piaenae fee not exaeedinp.one-halr or thn t%ite fee and that suoh liaenaee8 are no+:prevented irem pursui.ngsuoh occujmtion for the full t3.r.s whloh they would be otherwise entitlad, by remson of T.:J the cc!.-,ption of locel option in et-idccunty. “.I - 460 BonorableE. Y. Cunningham,Pago a In tieW Or ArtiOhJ 667-18, IIUprtA, it i&IOUT OpiII- ion that the licenseea who have been preventedrrom pur- ruiI,gtheir OOoupatiOn ror the full time to whioh they would be otherwiee entitled, by reason or the adoption of local option la said oounty, are entitled to have refunded to them the proportfmato amount ot license fee levied and oollooted by the county oovering the unexpired term. The retund should b. mmds out oi the @and in whlohthe license fees were origln- ally PlaOOd. with rerereme t0 th0 r0rund 0r 1iOWKM is08 paid t0 tbs State, your attention Is directed to Opinion Eo. O-1406 whioh holds in eiieot that there has been no speOlri0 appro- priation made by the Forty-sixth Lsgielature for th0 refund of saidroes paid to the State tor this bl-ennium. We are enclo8- ln# a oopy of thlr opl.nfonror your information. TruatlnS that the foregoing tully answers your inquiry, we are Youra very truly ATTOBWlEy GBBERAL OF TggAS ~ &&LLe?ch Arde!llwllliame Amdstant AW:BBB APPROVEDDEC 19, 19‘% EtvxatJRB /ifLaau*w ATTOR~~ GENERAL op TEXAS