Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Honorable Swain Burkett County Attoraer Castro County Dimmitt, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion Number O-2891 Re: Sale of county road bonds ,Hour recent request For an opinion ._. _ of this depart- ment, on tne questlon nereln stated, has Deen received. We quote frw your letter as follows: "On or about the 25th day of October 190 the Coewissioners' Court of this county passed the following order (see verbatim copy attached here- to). You will note that It contalns the follow- ing clause 'You will deliver the bonds to us at par and accrued interest to the date of delivery to us . . . . 1. Said bonds are to bear Interest at the rate of 3a per cent per ,annum'. The above was then entered as a contraot, and as stated, a copy is attached. "The Commlssloners~ Court of this countr and I opinion on this point: Does this amount of the bonds if voted an=ttaken -- under iEG$ion or shEi?i.dF~ count thsoz - and selrsame ----- the hiEhe% "It Is my opinion that the bonds should still be advertised and sold to the highest bidder. Artlole 7523 provides that they must be sold to the higheat and best bidder for cash . . ." Honorable Swain Burkett, page #2 (O-2891) Express statutory authority to Issue bonds lmpllea the power to issue them In the ordinary and usual manner, and the county may, by virtue thereof, sell the bonds and use the poceede for the purposes intended. Where the statute pre- scribes the method of sale, such method is the only method which c%n be followed. 34 Texas Jurisprudence, 671; City of Lubbock vs. Geo. L. Simpson & Company, 31 S.W.(2) 163; Gibson vs. Davis, 236 S.W. 202. The method for the sale of county 'roadbonds is pro- vided for in Article 7521 of the Revised Civil Statutes of Texas, which reads as follows: "After approval and'reglstration as provided by law relative to other bonds, such bonds shall continue in the custody and control of the Com- missioners' Court of the county in which they were issued, and shall be by said court sold to the highest -- and best bidder for cash, eltherihxole or In parcels, Gmess than their par value, and the purchase m=ytherefor w be pm in the county treasury of such county to the credit of the available road fund of suoh county, or of such politlcal subdivision or road district of such County, as the case may be." The contract submitted with your request seems to meet the statutory requirement that the bonds will be sold at not less than their par value. However, we are unable to determine from the facts submitted whether or not the Commissioners1 Court complied with the other statutory requirement that the bonds shall be sold to the highest and beat bidder for cash. It appears from your brief that the principal question you are interested in is whether or not said bonds should be advertised for sale. The statutes of this State provlae that certain bonds must be advertised for sale, such as road dis- trict bonds, where sald district is located in two or more counties (Article 778k, Revised Civil Statutes), but we find no such provision for the sale of county road bonds. There- fore, It is our opinion that county road bonds do not have ,A, -. - .,--.~ Honorable Swain'Burkett, page #3 (o-2891) to be advertised for sale. The only statutory requirement for the sale of said bonds is that they must be sold to the highest and best bidder for cash at not less than their par value. Trusting that this answers your question, we are Very truly yours ATTORREYWZNERALOFTEXAS B? /s/ Claud 0. Boothman Claud 0. Boothman COB-s:mjs Assistant APRlOVED JAN 10, 1941 /s/ Gerald C. Mann ATTOFlNEYGENERAL OF TEXAS APFROVED OPINION COMMITTEE BY /s/BE! CHAIRMAN