Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

1/ OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN ‘RALDc. MINN ITO”elW QllUUL ,~ Honorable Bert Ford AdnrtnlOtratOr, Texas Liquor aontrol Board AWAn, Texas Dear Sir: PogGlation Pee 86,000 or less . . . . . . )~U~.g~ 25,001 to 75,000 . . . .l 75,001 or more . . . . . . m:oo 'The annual fee for a paokege aton, outside of olties and towns shall be One Hundred and Twenty-fire ($X36) EionorabloBert Ford, page 2 Dollare, exoept ths aunual tee ror a pokage store outside 0r an lnoor- porsted olty or town and wtthln _. -~two (2) mllsa of the oorporate limits ehalL be the same as the roe required in said incorporatrdcity or town. 'The annual fee for a package store to sell wine only in cities and towns shall be based on populationaocard- lng to the last p~eoedingFsdsralCen- aus as rolmf8: Population Fe* e,ooo or leaai.. . . . . . . # s.00 e.001 to a,000 . . . . . . . 7.80 S,OOl to 10,000. . . . . . . 10.00 10,000 or more. . . . . . . . Ui.30 *The annual ret9 rar a paokage *tore to sell wine only outdid8 or oitiea and towus ehall be Fire ($5) Dollars.~ “It 1s known that there hare been ohangea in the 1940 oenaua rigtwa over those 0r 1030 whioh will a2ieot applloable permit'ieeawith- ' iu the various olaasl2loationa. All paokage store perinltrr expire August 81, 1940, and ara aubjeot to renewal on September 1. Wo would like to know the date a new redera Csnsus be- aomea orriciallyapylloable in determinlngt the aosecssd rates for paokage 8ton permits,w Thla Dspartaent haa heretorora passed upon the quoation aa to when the 1940 ~adoral amm beoomar oon- trolllug under statutea involving population in Opinion NO. a-8337. A copy of this opinion is enclosed ror pour oonrsnlenoe. It will be noted that under Submotion (8) ai Seotion 15, Artlole I of the Teraa Liquor Oontml Aot, that the annual fes ror a paokage store In oltlea and towns and the annual fes ror a pWcaage atom to roll wine only in oitles and town8 shall be based on populationaO- oordlng to the last preceding ~edsral Census as stated in said statute. IionorabloBert Ford, Page 3 A8 above rmntloned all paokase rtorei psrmitr 8x- pire August 31, 1940, on6 are subjeot to renewal on Septen- bar 1. In vlaw of the roregolng 8tatute and the above mentlor:edoplnfon BTo.O-2337 you are respeottully adrlred that it la the opinion of thi8 D8partm8nt ii the offlolal proaounosment of the 1940 oenaus la asde prior to Septem- b8nr1, 1940, said oenau8 would beoo&8 ofiiolally applloa- bl8 ln deterslnlng the ass88aed rat4s for paokag4 mtor4 p8rlaltr. On the other hand, It orfloial pronouno8ment or t&a 1940 Federal Cen8ua la not aado until after Septmnbrr 1, 1940, then the Federal aensu8 of 1930 would bo applloa- ble in determlnlng the aclsesredrater for paokage 8tore pemitm. mmdng that the r0ng0iw sully an8w4rs your inquiry, ti are Tour6 very truly