Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable Tom Seay county Attorney potter county hmarillo, Texarr Dear sir; ue hare oarefull sented in your Utter or the oplnlon of this depar q?ree cash Gift AWardr aa you attatrhedto your letter to be praotloed by a violation or nrtfole r *et enry psrson in this oity ding 8ay know mr0 territory ore and more about tha complete that we carry at the Very and so that you may visit our 8torb pressriptlandepartment and make the acquaintanceor our tine staff or employees, and that we may meet you an& know pU personally and be able to serve you bettor, W have adopted sn advertising plan mbereb a rrubetan- tial cash award will be made to the pubrio amry day except Sundan and legal holidays. Honorable Tom Seay, page 2 "The rules of this plan are aa follows:-- 1. Every person who pePtlclpateamust rin out one only permanentregistrationoard iving his true name and oorreot address. #iotitlousnames will not be aonaidered and there uelng them will not be allowed to partisipate. Thie registrationoerd makes a person eliglbls but euch person must sign the daily register 'bookevery day in order to qualify for that day*8 oash gift award. 2. It is not necessary for the publio to make a purahase in order to partiolpate. 3. Cash gift awards till be made at 3lSO P.M. every day (Sunday6and holidays excepted). 4. Inrormutlonrelativeto the awards will be posted in our windona and atore. 5. It la not neoessary ror partlolpantsto be present at the time of the drawing to re- oeire the oash gift awards. 6. Every day some dlsintereatedperson will draw a number stub rrom the box, suoh num- bersd atub being the rlnnin~ number ior that day. 7. In the event that the name ot the pereon holdfag ~thewinning number does not appear on the daily register, $1.00 will be added every day until the girt award ti made to some person In the communitywhoee name ap- pears on the daily register. 8. IIIease of any dispute, the merohant's de- cielon ehall be final. 9; Store emplopaes, their ramllfes and rela- tives, are not eligibleto partialpeteor receive the oaah gift awards. 10. IF YOU HAYE NOT XQX.STEf#D,PLEASE DO SO AT OlJCE ." Honorable Tom &my, pa@ 3 Your letter further #tates: "It Is oontended that suoh sohome does not constitutea lottery, beoauee there Is no considerationlnvolvod and that ohsnose are rreslp and openly given to all persons deslr- lug same, without regard to whether a purohaae la made from the mrsrohantapartlolpatlngor not. We believe It to be the general rule that ln order to oonstltutea lottary tbre must be three element@ present, to-wit, (1) oonslderatlon,(2) @heme, and (3) prize, end that all three such elementa must be pre6ent. . . .- We believe that Oplnlon Ho. O-2063, a6 previous- ly given by this offloe to Honorable Prsd T. pertu, County httorneg or murmn county, is dlrsotly In point ror the oaaa you have at hand. Ne at%ach hereto a oopy or that opinion. AS you will observe, this -Box orrlee fnouranoe* was obtainablefrom the motion pioture theatre by a mere act or registration,without requlslte attendanoe at the theatre. Also, the winner of tha award did not have to bo present at the.theatre, but hl6 n&me as wlmer wa6 posted In the lobby, and he oould colleot thr money at any time wlthln thirty days; or upon hi8 tallure to present hlmarli to receive the money, the said 6um would be given to the rarent teachers @aoolatlon. Opinion Ho. O-2063 aekmwledges the readily ap- parent qualitieeof ohanoe *nd pFlxe, and demt6s ltaelt ehlerly to the question of oonalderatlon. In this respectt the eases of Cole va. Stats, 112 8. W. (2d) 725, $tate ~8. Robb and Rowley united, Ino., 118 s. w. 917, and Feather- stone vs. IndependentServlae Station Assooiatlon,10 S. Wh (2d) 124, are eited aa lnetanoeswherein the oourte hate held that the oonslderatlonInvolved although to a de@ee lntaaglblewas neverthelesseffeatlve, and that the absonee of an aatual requiredpurohase or other lnveatmenton the part or the would-be reolplrnt or the prize, was not aUtri- olent to relievethe praotlce in question of the etigaaeOr under the olasslrleatlonor a lottery. 0onki.n~ Honorable TotsSeay, patie4 In view of the authoritleeolted ln opinion MO. O-2063, and the parallel clroumatanceswhioh these oases have to the case which you present, you are respectfully advised that it is the opinion of this department that the scheme described by you and upon which ou request an opln- ion does constitutea lottery in vlolat1:on or mtiole 654 of the yenal Code of this State. Very truly yours