Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

GERALD C. MANN ~.1\ GST3s ('1. T.r?;rA~ A'CT"KaNmcY~~Nm!xaAE. AZ w,ki776/ Hon. Walker Carson County Attorney HudspGth County Sierra Blanca, Texas Dear Sir: Opinion No. O-1967 Re: May the Commissioners' Court legally expend county funds for the hos- pitalization of Deputy Sheriff shot while in line of duty? Your request for opinion upon the above stated question has been received and carefully considered by this department. "Counties, being component parts of the State, have no powers or duties except those which are clearly set forth and defined in the Constitution and statutes, The statutes have clearly defined the powers, prescribed the duties, and imposed the liabilities of the com- missioners' courts, the medium through which the different counties act, and from these statutes must come all the authority vested in the counties. "The grants of power to such governmental agencies as counties, townships and school dis- trlcts are generally more strictly construed than those to incorporated municipalities. The Commissioners' Court is not vested with any general police power......" (Texas Jurispru- dence, Vol. 11, Sec. 36, p. 563) "Commissioners' courts are courts of llmit- ea jurisdiction, in that their authority extends only to matters pertaining to the general wel- fare of their respective counties, and that their powers are only those expressly or lmpliedlg con- ferred upon thetiby law, - that Is, by the Con- stitution and statutesof the State."~ (Texas Jurisprudence, Vol. 11, Sec. 37, pp. 564-565) Also see the following cases: Hon. Walker Carson, page 2 o-1967 Edwards County vs. Jennings, 33 SW 585; Seward vs. Falls County, 246 SW 728; Dun Vapor Elec- tric Company vs. Reenan, 30 SW 868; City of Breckenridge vs. Stephens County, 26 SW (2nd) ,405; Scaling vs. Williams, 284,SW 310; Moore vs. McLennan County, 255 SW 478; Hill County vs. Hamilton, 273 SW 292; Temple Lumber~Co. vs. Commissioners' Court of Sabine County, 239 SW 668; Commissioners' Court vs. Wallace, 15 SW (2nd) 535. After a most careful and exhaustive study of this question we have been unable to find any authority, express or implied, which would authorize the commissioners' court of your county to expend county funds for the hospitalization of a deputy sheriff shot while in line of duty. You .are, therefore, respectfully advised that it is the opinion of this department that your question should be answered in the negative and it is so answered. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/Wm. J. Fanning Wm. J. Fanning Assistant WJF:AW;wc APPROVED FEE 20, 1940 s/W. F. Moore FIRST ASSISTANT ATTORNEY GENERAL Approved Opinion Comm$ttee Bs s/BwB Chairman