Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE Al-l-ORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN xonorabloLlntons. Batage oountyAttorney "The indentma aeourlngtbew obligntionrdU eon- try oortainoil and gee leasesand UoIpb roe propertyin tbo States~Qf Kansasand OIslehow and,as wall,mm. 011 and gae leaSee in the Oountiesoi Flueow an4 San PatrlOi0, Tezas. wThsm 1s also pledgeda oontraotooverlng purohase 0f gas rr00 oertaln lease in sarimtriofo County,Texas, and oontraoteooverlngsale 0r gas produoedrr00 all three atatw. "All of thebonds oi SerIssAwlll bq ppohaeed tram the mortgagor by Metropolitan Life ilheuranae Company, a oorporatlonor IfewYork. All of the bonds of SeriesB will be purohasodfrom the mortgagorby The Rational city &Ink or wm York.', You mentionan 0 by 8n AsslatantAttorney General under the preoo6Ing a tratlon,dated Fobrunry 1.5,1957, addremed to the OotmtyAttorneyof PotterOounty,to thm li- rO0t that a trust indentw on propedee wlthln a8 we&l am ulthoutthe State of Texas in favor of and dellreredto non- reeldontm of the Statew exempt rrom the tax, and you further mentionan oplnlon by t&o prior adminfstratlon at thir offloe, addrwied to thr Cwnty Attorney OS WI@dta Oounty,dated Way 27, 1938, see to hold that obligationaowned by nqtlonal banks are aoqtfrorawhtu. You rrqueatour oplalona8 to wholib~ or not thr indo!atureof mortgage to be axooutedby RepublloBatural CaOk+mpeny, before beIn reoordod, anst.bo lltempe6la aooordinaowith the pr0Y1010nrr or Arti 70470, B.C.&, u auadod by 8.B. Xo. S4 by the 44th Logislafiure. 8aId S.B:Mo. $34,46th Logialaturr,made In part as roll.rrrre *boept aa bmln othenI80 provldodthere Is bbro- by lotiedend awmew6 a tax of Ten (lC#)Cents on oaoh One Hpodmd (#lCC,OO~Dollar8 or Sraotiontheroof,over the fir& W Thmdnd ((eW.00) Dollara,on all not.8 d obll&atlons mow6 by ohattolmortgags deed of til.t uahanl~*r 1108~oentmot vendor'@lien oonbitlon- a l lai~a6ontxa~tandallln&ntants of a slmLrnatw W&Oh a%% illed or reoorbl In the orfloe of the County Clerk under the Eegl#tratIonLaw6 of thI# State; protided that no tu aball be l&vied on Inrtxumentsseourlngan amount of Tro Bundm6 0NO.00) Dollam, or.1~~8. After .Mo ltfeo tly dateeof tai8 Act, uoept aa hereInaftor provided,no wah instrumentehall be tiled or reworded byanyCounty Olerklnthls St~tauutlltWre harbeen affllrsd to mah Inatwnt stamp@in aooordanae ~i$h the pmtIrrIo~ oi thlr meetion;providingfurtherthat nhouldth* Instntnuntf’I1.d In .thoofi'ior ot the Oounty Clerk bo 8eourityof an obligationthat baa property pledge6•~ 8aaurIfyIn a State or States other than Texan, the tu #hall bo baaed upon the raaronnblooa8h value of all propertypledgedin Texas in the proportl6n Ton. Llnton S. Savage, Page 3. that said property in Texas benrs to the total vcluo of the pmgerty aoa~~lng the obligation; ... and pMVided further that when onoo str:mpodas provided herein, an instrumentmay be recorded In any number of countioa In thie State without again being 80 stamped. ... *If the amount aooured by a instnunentIs not ox- proseed therein or if any part of the soourlty dosorlb- od In any suoh lnstnrmsntappears to be looatod wIthout the State of Texas the County Clerk shall require proof by written affidavitsof suoh feots as may be nooossary to determine the amount of the.tax duo.* Tho provisionwith reforenoe to proratlng,thetax, wbsro a pert only OS tho aeourlty Ir,looatod In the State of Texas, was not la tho original Artiolo 70470, R.C.S., a8 the semo erieted et the tlmo of the oplnfon to the County Attorney of Potter County. Furthermore,we might obaene that on April 29, 193S, the proood- lng edmInlstratlonof the Attorney Goneral'sDepartment ln an opinion wr$tten by H. L. rcllllford,Aseietant Attorney Gonoral, addroeeod to Ron. C+rley Lookhart, State Treasurer, Nled uon- trery to the opinion or February 15, 1937. In our oonferenoo opinion MO. 3061, dated June 17, 1939, addressed to Ron. Charlay Loolchert,State Treasurer,we expressed the via that'tho tax levied by 8.8. No. 24 1s a tax upon the prirllogo 0r rwordIru3. PertloulerlyIn vlow 0s the lnoluslon in the amended Aot oi the prov%slons requiringthe prorationof the tax whore a pert or the eaourlty 1s looatod outside tha State of Texas, we bslloro thnt the instrument in quo&Man muat beer atampa ae provided in the emended Aot, and dotormlnodas therein provided. In opinion Ro, O-267, dated February 25, 1939, add&sod to the State Troamurer, es well a8 lo our opinion No. O-874, rsomtly given to the Banking Commis~lonerof Toxea, we oxpnrsed tho rlow thet lion instrumentstalc- by national banks and owned by them are not subjoot to tho tax. However, it wIl1 be noted that In the iaota submitted to ua by you none of the bond6 aooured by this ln- denture of mortgage Is now owned by tho Rational City Bank of Now York, but apparently that bank simply plans to puroheeo SerIoa B of the bonda ao eeoured. If wo understand the instant situation oorrootly, the Matlonal City Bank of Now York would not be paying this tex. Henoo no exanptlon would be afforded the Indenture of mortgage In question. The tax #hould be oaloulatod aa eot forth In S.B. No. 24 and oollootod eooordlngly. YOWS VOlF$'tNu GRL-W ATlDlU?EIGENEIULOlr~i!XAS APP~WVED SEP 7, ,lQSQ . Gerald C. Mann (signed1 AT’IDRNJIY GENERhL Op‘TEUS