Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

TIQIE ATFOENICY GENERAL OFTEXAS Mr. T. W. lWabl8 Peat AoeiBtant 8ta~~8upsnwl.&toa4ent , Dear 8lrI *lalm No.o-1384 4: Plaalltyoffla4lngof%a- usllalmrext*xtnordiasr;lroa- 41t1omB*by Ikk nepartnnt or mu8ai0n. 9oe8 the attrte Atulitor ham dlrant1am Ln the nttw or 4arwliag UI urr~u CS~- ditloa m l8 thatto be 4oteminedby the Itate8uperinten4eataa pprwed by the Mat* Boar4 or muert1ont katioa8 4 ui4 tl of 8.,B. 349, oh. 475, Aetr 45th &81rbtUXW pe 1071 8-m &,8lQIZ, U Uuadad 07 1. 1. 133, lh. 60, (2dfc. 8.. 85th b8181&-, ). 197'2,red am follou~r 'Wetion 4. Tea&m--hrpllLoad.8-k aid under prwlmlam or thir A8t 8ball k an0ttd upon tk, bar 0r w t0~m f0r any -r of rohoantlertra twenty (no) to thlrt~-flvo(35f and on@ 8ddltloaal to-her for lreh addltfoaal thirty (30) 8eholUtio8, Qp lN8tiorul pu't thereof, l'@8idw in (lirtriot.xt 18 -884 th. PS'O- +Mad that la the wont pupllrare tramrerud intO the di8trbt the exe088 irrotl t$hehez; 8hall not be 1.88 than Go .%z rhallbe The b88irfor raleul*tloa the netkholutle lzwmratlm of whitem' soloredram, u the owe rcy bo, laelw the tranMex%late the dirtrlat, and . lxowalng the truurerr out or the dl8trlot fw the aurreat ,per ud there @.mll be ae- @UCtltd ill -Wh~l~tiO@ UhO hV0 8O&Ot8& the 8OUF8c Of@tUdyin thel.+how 8ohOol, BB authorited w the c,e%in 'm Or hut&r, prwiQ@ that uhqrk e+.kxtrwralneq .' W&itbfl8 QauIe UI rOtti %Mluu@ &tlWOll- mtnt, m adjudment 88 to the number 8r k&ehera may be made b tim State 8uperlnteadent with the rpprovlri ,0r t L dtate Board OS mueatloa a& to ~exoiad tha teaaher-pupil,load prwided tire*;. prwIde6 further that tier ,no oondltlorm' 8hall.aId be grant@d m dI8trlat In ax- ~~88 or thh.m8r or k~~hm 80tidrj emmad r0r ma -1~86. Wietlon 81. me 8tate,AuUltor'r :orrlae,ir hereby directed to audit all ~Pllcatlon8 r0r'aIb after 8aum .hfwe been .jM88ad'4S'I b the bircctO%'Of 6qMll8&iOn cad y&ken8uth applicatioa ha8 been appr6ved by psld director, it shall thin be the duty of the Btatc Auditor to apprwe, rod$fy or ‘3’8j8Ct 8uch aPP~I~Sti~, befOre 8(W 18 prerented to the Btate Bqt.rdo? puc&loti by the Direqtzor,?r &y~cation. .AWl'el'ulNading O? the:&& a8 8 whole di$ClO8e8 M&t-the primtry &urUerior ulmlnirtering the iat I8 pl8ae&qmn the8kt~~Dgpdirtae8t of Muaatlon uid in partiaular upon the Otate Bqpcr~ntendent,~Dire~tor of Bqtiliratlm and Stste Board of Sdua*tlon. ~me duty or thc.'Statemaltor* orrice g8 to audit ml1 applIaatIon8 atter'theyhave'been lp p r b ved b7 the IEGtor al ~Xquallz:stlon,The ten "auuit* In it8 Ordinary 8eMe aearm to emualnc, oheck or verlry aCOOUXht8r Uhen the Auditor 1l~dlreCfed bjythin .rctto ~audlt' the ~ppllcatlorm, doe8 it Wlul that the o~tirc adWnl8tratI6kOt the ect 18 to be Plaoed onder h&s oontrol 'or that h?,$a giren~~~unrestrieed veto parer wcr d48cretienary r#3dhg8 'We bfz~thc State Super- intendent and.,State.lmml of rbhoation? Ud .do not think the authorIt to aPPtive,,+odlm or reject apPllOatIOM~Ulu intended to 60 to 8Wh'extent: Untler &o&a 4. ad)rwwrri u to the number or tea- 8her8 uq be urdt by th& 8tate &iperlntendant'wlfh the WProval or the State +wd or~;BOuaatiion l~here ummal or utraordlnam eonditiona cmwe a sd$wl a.nanaim ln earoA&ent. * Whether given crlratim8take8'coi&ituk o r lxtraordlnar7 o c r x ll- tlon8" ruffloient to'J*tIfy an in the number ot Ur. 3% W. TrWble, tafp 3 xt le &UP eplnl~nthat the 8tate udItorJAc~f?l68 doea not have direr&ion ln the latter of determlalag an un- wual rozialtlori~er.uie~~~l~rtion~~u'ai the 49l L@8-' lature,but pu8h dtieredn $a.~rtrd'in'the8kk:8uparlntendent ud.(Itatqkear4 ~ofi~4atloa;