Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFlCE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS AUSTIN szana?eh10 Earal& 3QecraoLan h68istaotCXvllDistrietnttonwy Eall CJfRooard8 Dalla8,%xaa Dear sirs letterof July 1010 5951, RO- iaw withinwhioh a y publlowiy quality. In p"om latter and 8 l.n7v1784, but 4lffsrantly Geaersl2. F. LooBey-, Zune County ikttornay 0r 5?ravia th8ZI ElCitizenOf (1) Doea Ax-MoleSOSl, Revised Statutes,authorize a oountyam?k, before he raoeireaa oalanlssion from the Se- ar&my of Statd~for a pizrty appalntednotary publia,to 'notify sal4 party to appearbefore him wIthin tea days, pay for his oomml~slon,and qualityacraardfng to lm"? (2) IX It does mt, is said party entitledlm rs- oeefte8tmhmtfoed’te&la oaml8slanlma beenrewl~edbg the elerm Bon. XarolU ::cCraaken, Faga 2 (3) If be ia, may he then qualifyat any time within ten daya frolztho roaalptof crushnotioe? .uld (4) If he my, are the sxaeptiom aontainedin said artlalsavailableto him? ti -9 27, 1917, AttOTJley %Xl8rS3 ~OMY a~~I’O7Od &UlfUl’0Zi00 O&loa No. 1777,inwhloh the quo8tion8 subPELt?& by Hr. Romrby mre fully amwW4d. (Reports Of the AttOl’B0y General,1916-19l8,p* 422) The opinionquotesArt.10108 6015 and 6016,Revbed Statute8of 19ll. These art10108vme brou@t forwardin the Rwised Statutesof 1926, without mt- orlal #mnge8, a8 krtlole8I5381and SQSE feqmtimly, and they have not since been amended. Therefore, tf the uzmer8 found in OpinionZZo!1777 ware aorrsot then, they am oorreat now. X0 belierathat o~l.ni.an aorraotlyOOmtTUw the statute8 involved and spgrovaIt. A oopy or whloh irrherowithonoloaed. It ctnswera the tirst three of the qnestians nbove steted, It doe.0not answerthe Sourth qU08tbn, but it is apparentthat the exemptionsOQX apj-Aponly where the party Las beastlegally notif 94 or hi6 sppaintment. Xe aannot be lagallynotifiedby the albrk until that o:?ioerhas in his possas$ionthe paty*s cozzR3b3sion. Wo armuw question.Bo.1 ln the negative,and eaah of the three e+mtn2u~ questionSin the affirui&lYe. In this commotion, we call to your attQntlon for chtaver it my be xorth, the awe of Taablm v. ZWite, 104 Tsx. cri....iep.70, xt s. x. 597. ~losso ccce;?tour thanks for the vary able namer in ~:hi.ch you !mvu stated the i'uots,the questions submitted ind Ubwzised the lsf;clpoints involved. Yours v&y truly AFPROVED .TuL12, 1939 =.&