Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
AUSTIN

-I& 0. MANN
- .**-

Mr. F. X. Rightor, Seoretary
Texas State Board of Reglstratdonfor /“”
PmqfesslonalEnglneors
h.mtin, Texas \\
Dear Sir:

k’sare in reo tar of Sun0 1 in
wh:oh you ask our opini atire we&ht to be
gltsn erfdenoa of lloema engineer8 and li-
earme& land survs
tea r4lating to pro-
ernon*a Annotated
I)Iimieles 8808.to
where aith4rpro-
ng in our OOurt8.

did not err Zn

t it was entit.leUto a0 smm
weight than the testlmcmy of a wltnW8
who knau the same faota.w
See also the ease of Ksrllok 1. Hey@, 19 8. W.
Mr. F. E. Rightor, Page g

Ii either a lloensed profseslonalengineer or ll-
oensed land surveyor should be oalled as a witnesa~to quall-
ry as an expert, it would not be Eiufrlolantto prove'On4
that hs belongs to the proSeeaIonor oalllng to whloh the
nubfoot matter or the Inquiry relates; he murt further
ahow possesalon of speoial knOwledge as to the very quea-
tion on which he proposes to express an opinion. Soo 19
Tex. hr. 72, Par. 47.
The general rules of evidenoe would oontrol the.
testImOny oreeither wltneas and the oourt or fury is given
the prorlnoe 0r passing upon the oredibiLityor weight to
be given suoh eridenoe.

yours very truly

BWtFL

APpRoVE&Wl? 21, 1939