Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN Honorable Joe C. Gladney Criminal District Attorney Rusk County Hendrrson, I'exas Dear Sir: OS thia'apecial tax. The following qnesti~onsneeessarilf ariee: (1) After the Bederal cemms is a&pleted and the figures are ~a- learred, ana ass~ng tlhilatthe populatfen of Rraakcounty Eon. ;oe C. Clndney, .2ril 20, 1030, ?age i: wiii tc beW;tec :'il'Sy thousend acd sixty-f,lrathousand, xiii kale County bc:crenpt from the acti (2) if the first (;mstloziis answered lu 'theafrirmtive, cm the 1940 t&Xe.P,urhichwili br-tissessaabefore the census is taken, be coliooted;" Article 2744e, i)ernon's¬ated Civil Xetutes, Ineofar hs pertinent to your c;ue?tions,provides in Section 1 thereof as follo!%s: "Sea. 1. All counties In this State havlnf!a population of not mo:;et,ianthirty-two thousand five Hundred (31?,500)nor lese then twenty thousand (20,000), eooordiag to the lest praoedihg Federal Cenmw, and oontelninga valuation of Seventy-SlvaYllllon Dollar8 ($76,~00,000)or mom, are hereby orwted into oounty- wide equallzatIoneohool diatriotr, end.seoh suoh oounty shall have the oounty unit aystam or oduoetlonto the axtant.apeoifladIn this Aot and may erarelre tha taxing power oonrerred on eohool 618trIot8 by Artlalo 0, 6oa- tion S of the Cohatltutlonto the extent hanlnef’ter provldedbut auoh taxIn& pow& ahall not be ~&~olw4 uutll and uhleas ,authorIzedby a madorlty of the quaI.- .Irledproperty taxpaying voters ralrIdIh&therela at ah elaotloato be held.ior that purpoea a8 hareinaitsr provIde4.W Ineuauoh ea the applIoabIlItyOS &tIoti.2'1448,+brIIOIl’a imuotated Civil Statutea, 16 not llmltad to oountlds~har~ a population of not more than S2!,500,nor lam than 20,000, aooord- lng to any apaolflo or desIgnate IXaoenhlalBcdderalCbnmm, but WaooordIngto the lent pmoadl~ Federal Uanneua~it 10 oUr opinion that Rusk County Will be taken out or tha opore0Irb efreOt of thl8 hrtidle In the event your aaatmptIon8 rhould bs v$ndloatadby the orriolel Federal Cenaua ror 1940, end it should appear therefrom that Rusk County will have a popuXatIon of gram M),OOO to 45,000 inhabitants. But the removal of Rusk County from tne aoope or Artlole 2744c, Vernon's Annotated Civil Stetutas,will not ooour until the populationof Rusk County for the year 1940 has baan offiolally d&&reined, ascertained and publiehed by the Bureau of the Censu8, in eccordenoewith the provisions and requirementsof Title 13 u. s. C. A. sectiqn l-112, end:.emendmentsthereto, Insofar es euoh congressional sots are psrtln&nt to the taking end publication OS ?;on.JCP L,.Clr:dney,i.or2i29, 1939, ?age 3 the Cece.2.ioi~ of 1SCC. .Lherect that i!uskCounty now ::e-lr;us tccrsts53pcpulatior?in excess.of the statutory brackets fixed by ,.rtic1c274&J, Yernonts ihnnotatedCivil :'tatutes,does not render ,.ucii statute ixmedietely inoperative, nor will the official deter- mination e3d ,promulgationof thi.sfact by the Bureau of'the Census relate beck so as to render the stetute inoperative as of the date of the teking of the census+ 14 c. J. yecundum p. 103; Lewis v. iackaxanna County, 50 ktl. 162. it is generally keld that in the absence of a statute providing when the census Shall go into legal effect, it beoomes official and effective as of the date of the publloation, by a bulletin, oertitioatasto. or the Dlreotor or the‘Censu6. 14 C. J. .~eounduap. 103, Holoo6b V. Spikes, 252 5. W. 891. It la then but not until then that the oourta will judlolallynotlob the populationof a given county so a6 to pernit ohahgaa In ol.saal- ticatlonabased thereon. Smith v. Petteraan, 24B S. u. V49. ApplpIng thla datannInetIv4~4etsto your asoond quaatloa mgsrdlng the oollaotabIlityof the'taaba In quaatloh for the year 12940,it la the opinion of thla Dapartaant that your oorrolu- aion is again oorreot, and that aal4 oounty-wldaaquallaatlontaxes levied by Article 2V;Us, Veraon*s Annotated Civil Statutea,may lawrully be oolleoted. 'We Art1016 apeoitioally~pravl4ea that the taxes thereby laviad-shallbe oolleoted by the aaae OfrlOor6 and under the same laws es oounty~advaloramtaxaa. The tax levied by Artiole 27448, Vernon*8 Ahnotated Civil,Statutea,havlw bean duly easeaaed prior to any posalbla erreotlve data ot the 1940 Federal Cenaua, will, under governing statute8 ahd the ~pl6I.n prlnolpl or.taxatIon,be subjeot to oollaotlan. Yours very truly OF.!CEXAS BY A66i6t6lIt APPROVITD