Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN April 8, lfml xon. C&&la83.. hrtin County kudftor xorrl8on tamnty pt of thi lnqulry - lath0 to at8 8bovo to aaaworyou mea- 0 or Ml18 bipartyat, on4 noonvonsona64 you* . u aot out Artlalo a BerSad <1lvll oopawtlbn or a orlmln8l J,o r o o a nty llk +rwhnoopym- 06 or dimtrlot lttaney* te&atImt ooAp8n8atlorP ‘Jr~h s8 l8a l8ta ant0la ,1 1 b opaid oat o r th e stiimtyOffSo o Xa r%la Fr olnd, b utth 8ittat 8b a pl.l 8y 3 eaohy e a r intoa x &fund ~0 aaoont aqwil to a mu wh~ab..beer8tlw eafm proportion to th8 tatal 8Elary *r eJaeh6rIlahaz dlntrlot attorawy or oounty .atny pcrrfcwm%u& tit8 dutSee 0r a dhbtrlat 8ttonaJr,. tqpther~tith Iion. Chsrlee 5. f?artin,.;prila; 1939, Page I$ the salery of 51s ssslstants, as all reiow teas aolleoted by suoh orrlolel during the year 0r 1935 bear to the total rees aolleot- ad by such orrlalal during such gear.* Your letter oontains the rollowlngparagraph: 7hle atetute Is a little oonruslng to ., me,snd Iwoul6appreelats asioplnloniraa your Domrtwllt Ju8t how the ca8@bllor'8 oft100 mporlyd.lao&e theropto rlatlau by the It6 @laturo payable to the.brl WC'8 '. S8la r Fywd fo rth e ~a 0unt.y ltto r ne yo*a fflo o .g we t&6 it you d8Il our oplnlon *a to whathor the proosdum followed by th6 Camptroller% 0Sflaa 18 lagal and 1s a aorrwt appllyatlonpr the atatutohorwln- .... .' ahow ~l&lotod. : .- . . . C' ._ You did got aot'out ths piwadura &ilomi&.by the Oolllp~~r,banoorein~~lered~.~oino~~ or that ptb86 or the ~ttabh w*. era hip w reoelm4U lmhrraatlonthat the oounty.at4qrne~..of ~lwnn Oouatyla193soo$.l.eotadatotd0r $8,857dw,~orrhi0b . $s sss.00 ~6 00ue.6a frm the tih lf~r6loriJ 0b0~; uhhe other Sow amount to #5,!5lW39. Thla-made the peroentagoqtelfl~~7 the Stat0 r0r r4biw eases SO.68 par oat or the total oolleoted. $8 ml~tt#d to the Camptrol~er,t&a.tot&l 8aL erlas of the 00iity attoni~y*n 0rri06 ror 1939 la #6,9m~x; a total maaohad by addltlon ot the salaq? of the oowty ~.. attornsy (~4,fso.oo) t0 tat-or bia tw 6t4dstma ($l,soo;u0+ and $900.00). The Comptrollertakes thb peroentage arrived . at a8 ahoan above, $7.63 per oent of *,950&O, *hiOh 16 $2.614.59,the amowtt dw by the Stete M Harrlum Ooitntyror the yerear loso, rmder the provisions or tbe art.1010or the statu?x ugder oonslderatlon. But, re learn rmr fx& ths Ooaptrol.ler, whlie u&r the provlslonsof tb statute voted, '~S,614.59 15 dw Xarrlaon County, thep 18 a total of ww thirty- WOZl. Charlea i-Z. Yartln, npril S!J1939, Page 3 three oountfee in tble State in the oBme category, 1. e.. with county attorneya performiq the duties of district attorueye,or orlAna dlstrlct attorneys. By the seme prooees detailed above as appliaable to Harrlaon County, eaoh oounty psrtlolpatlng is allowed its proentage of the amount collected in 1935, and when.thle 1s done and the ellowablo under the provisionsof Sec. 15(a), eupre, are added, the total amount due by tinestate for 1939 la $200,922.30. fiowarar the approprlatlonof none7 by ~~Legle~t~leodly~l~,4e0.00 ~Genezeld.jSpeoi.al . . w 45th bglelatrw, Regular Ssenlon, pa ll6S). l'hla belug w $34,000.00la88 than dw all of the eountlee under Artlale 39lZ-e. Sao. Xi, eupra, or only 73.898 per oat thereof, and it ha8 been the praotlae of the Coq- troller to pay eaoh oounty that perocatagaof the amoaat dw it wtler the law. .mmmre, the comptioller, ador the rindhg r a a te mo ntlo wd lbovo'that3iarrlson'Couaty Ia ontltlo4 to $&614.89 under the prorleione or 4tlole 3912-e,. eapre, leeued it8 quarterly rouoher Sor one-rotuth,of 72.878 per cent of that amount, or $476.36 for the quar- ter fanuary, February and Uaroh of thle year. A like amoant will be payable at the end of eao~hramagnlng qua?- ter Of tba year, until the epproprktlonmedo by the Legie- .laturefor the year la o~eaeteU. In other worda, Xarrleon County a116*ash 0r th6 other ootmtle8 elmllarl~ eltueted will reoelre only 72,878 per oent of the aemnt. provided by Xrtlole SOl&e, eupra, for the roeeon tha Lagleleturefailed by 27.122 per oant to appropriate enough money .tomeet the obllgatlonsorthe State iapoeed by ltrrown law. .Thera la no redreee for thle eltuatlolt elbept‘ by appeal to the Leglelature,ae it la a fundamental propositionthat no ZWIIS~my be drewn rrom the State Treaeury exoept upan 8p80iri6 appropriation. Sea Art1010 8, Sed. 6, Conetltntlanor Taxnej Plakle te. 'Irlnley, 44 8111480;Kenlonre. Lookhart, ll48B (2nd) 6l.6. While there are no oourt de0leloa8 eonetrulng the pro~leloneof paragraph (a), Attlele SPlz-S, aupm, wa are of opinion tha Coaptrolleris properly applying the Zion.Zharlee 2. i'artin,Xprll 6, 1939, I-'aEe 4 statute, ana x% approve said prooadure8s catlined In t‘?s opinion lrsorer as its legality is concerned. Very truly yours ATTclsH~..~~?~~ OY TIUCkS .