Janua!'y 26, him nom F. L. hassio ' _ _ ’_;". Gocmty Auditor . - _Vernen, tresz - . hear Sir: ` - ' " opinion llo. o-ms noe Cen script issued far electric servicemanl used to pay texas? ' ms office is in recth of year letter et JBIII!BP¥M aaki.ngeurepini'auea teanothereeriptid-_ _.eaed to east texas otilities company for light current `fa:niahed!ilharger mtycenbeusedtopsyedvslar~; _-m texas of that ca¢q)aay¢ ~ - , 7 ¥ou cite Article tow noticed ‘Ci'ri'l Statutes, ' reading as follo`ss¢ *n\emeszmsabymnsmpwrm” _ payable pila_WM`°d’currency cr coin er th;dgeit¢:'*, states that corners ho ng iswed’ts them rcr services rendered the eousty say pay their scinty all salem texas in crash my (t),* 1a the absence cf statutes permitting him to de fee a rex collector cannot accept making except money is thai pageant of taxes. cooley on hunting eth M., ssc. 1253 ' ai C. J. holt meetrisity supplied to a wessz is a *c¢madity.* State vs interstate I*assr Go., .. :». e'. 42?, 118 Hchr m ace hohinloy Telephons Go. vs- Cuaberlaed Tolephene 00¢,1¢1 h. th 38, 153 his- 35¢¢. (Talephsns service is s oo:snedity). it is therefore our opinion that the forum of electricity is act a "scrvi.ee remorsd the aith within the cashing of article mem -\. I_isn._ 1°~'.. n- £-:nseis, summary 26, 1935 13ch 2 sugar articles relating tn usc usc of certain _f:fnds sf script in the panama of msmty t,.‘:..‘¢:es are article ;:£.'__: ilevissd Civil. Btau\tos swl miele icm code of a:r.i.-::lnal L‘raoo;dn~e. §c-it,h-.;~r cr these articles mr amy other 90 far as ne h=ive been able to find could msiwrizs fm acceptance of the script that you mentioned in payment of county taxes. ` rice question is therefore assessed in the vega- tivc+ . fours very truly
Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Combined Opinion