Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Jcacuary lZth, 1939 non. 2. coasatt, BanIdng Corlmlsaion8r Depnrtlentof IkInking Austin, Texas Dear sir: Opinion No. O-52 - Ras Artiole 350 & Utiole 352 Is there nny discretion permissible to the 3lmlcln& c~issloner in nab ing publlo the ,e.xazsiner*sreports on rinanoicll inotitutions? Your letter of Jammry 0, 1939, In whioh you ask an opinion as to oertaln quentions, has been r6feIT8d to the writer for nttctntim. Your questions are: 1. Goes til0 r?Jla or ;~rilr~lo~spertaining to oxminors* reports obtuin :Jit!irsspeot to instltu- tions that nre 01033a and not actively oni;agedin their oor2orata b*zsiuess nt the tlm the report is called for or SIXI arivilage invoked? 2. Does tho rule of ;~rivil.cgein any evcat a~- ply to Loan i: Erokern~e Companies $8 sazie as to bmki.zg institutions? 3. IS tllere'any Giscreticn pfirrzissibloto the Banking Comissloner in tho matter of naking publlo exa.nioere* reports by 6ivi.5g COpioS thereof or per- nitting the inspeotlon %he,eroofAnd If so, just what are the linits of, or the rJle5 goverain&, the ex- cld.38 or tklt discratiGn? Artlclo 350 or the Revised Civil Stntutes a5 amend- ed by the 41st X&;islatura,Hurst Called Session, Uzts of 1929 provictes ror the anpointzent of the bank axminers. ilrticle 333 of the :!eviscd civil Satutos prescribes 3s c?ualirlcation .shile.hrticle 352 of tha iiovisod civil 3atutos ?rovldes for t;lo bond and oath of :m curtminor, a5d nolong othsr things, pm- 7id8~s,tncit 118 3ilnll take oath, thnt - Eon. z. Goasett, January 12th. 1939 3aga no. 2 "He will not reveal the oonditlonof any bank or ban&&q trust oo~?pany, exruninod by bin or a.13~lniOX3BStl~ ~80~8% in the OOuP50 Or nnY BI- t%lzinotiun0r any bank or btxlking trust oonpany, to any one exocpt the C&ssioner." Artiole551 0r tha Penn1 Code providelJ ror the pen- alty to be inrllotod Upon a bank mminar for the violation ot the oath provtded for in ArtA. 352 of the Revised Civil 3tlltute6m Chlot Juntlce Cureton or the Suprem court, -Aen c-3 rirst assizltrrntattornay general 0r this Sate, wrote m exiiustive opinion undm date of Zarah 4, lQW, adCrossed to the Honorable John 3. Z?xtterson on questions maewhat relnt- ed to those asked by you with respest to the above statutes :i!:lohhave sin08 been renumbered Judge Cur&on said: qf8 think tho .sw&~&rz~of these two ~o~lsiont3 ;d:w aonnicioreci to.gether is, th%t 5 bank 8Xadnfz cannot voluntnrlly raveal the condition of any bank ms!:.tinodby him or Yoluntnrlly qivo any 0118 any in- lxxM.on oanccrnlng the oondition oi any suoh bank, IS suoh informtlon was SeOIAl-cdolfioially. These provisions, howevsr , do not prohibit euoh ZxazAner from siving his testizony in Q judioiol proaeedlng, ns the lnnqw~e of the provisions oloarly aeok only to 2rohlbi.t voluntary disolo~~ree on the psrt Or the axminer and do not atteibpt to prohibit s oourt from requirlnE; the examiner to disolone such roots, cm the oourt nay havs P right to roqtira to be die- 01030ii. Tha question thererove, finally reduaee itself to one or priy&e oonwsmioations~ The mime rulea ~0~1% r~o~ern an oxaainer in this rsapest 5s g0vt-m the C~soloner 0r Banking hlR58if, us ah ~sV~h8r in a gublio 0rri00r who reproaents the De- p~tzaxlt. or the COy8rw2eht whioh SUpOFVi38tl tllld oontmln the b.mka. Dri8rly, hle buslnoss io to mke,exwimtlon of State banks and to trensmit t0 the Comii53iomr 0r Insurnnoe iUld Bmking a rcvort or the condition of b%&i exanined by bin, iuld it IS upon the bmls 0r tk.080 r'oim-ts tht t:ie Codf3- sionor deterxihes ;rhether the bank shell OontiXIU8 c _. .i Xon. 2. Gossett, January lzth, 1939, Tage X0. 3 as a goiug inrtitutian or vðer it shall olose ita GW~S snd ooase to exist; llkewi.oe, ns to &at remireeents shall be mde of the bank by the Commissioner of In:aU%llCO and .BankinG. The bankexadner is r%quiicd to tnke'tan oath of ot- flos, Give bond, possase oertain qmlifloatlons and his gosition has all the characterfstlus of ahd is a pzblio offlao." h suonort of the shove, Judg Cureton oitedthb statutes horeinajove referrod to by the writer, as WJU aa the foll0vfin6;authorities: Liitche on Banks, Vol. 3, p. 17i3C, Sitters vs. Soxers, 43 ir'od.763. Article 3722 F&vised Civil Statutea proviba that t,C;o&mkihg Cohmissioner, alow ,aith other nazmd Govornmtmt orrlcials, shall: n+ 7 * -?.= Purhish auy person ap?lyih:: FOP t11a9am, a copy of .xny ?aper, iocumht or record in ti;cir offices, md xith oortificate uuder seal cortir;rin~;to my ‘Lankoontained ih the gapora, docur.vmts or rwordo of their offloos; and the same shall be received in ovldfmoe in all casm in which the oriGlnals rrould be evidanoe." Th;:s statute 13 not mandatory that Covernnent ot- ficialo prodiioo and furnish copies of a11 instrummt% that ni:;ht by o&nco be in their hands. It oannot extend to nor ticlude such doauments as might oontain InSor.wtion prejudi- cial to the publio interest rooeivad by (1 Government offiOio1 in an orflcial capaoity. i7hothor or Rot suoh inrormtioti or doomtmt, aim be renuirod or any oriicinlrsujt be rjovmmd by the general rules which r~ovcrn grivilqod cmmaniontlone to aublio os'r'loers. JudGo Wraton, 3.nthe +ove referred to opinion, states: "It xay ‘00 atnted as a @naral principal tht g~blic ~olioy forbids the naintenanoe of any s:.it in il Court or Ju&lco, tho trial of'which xo'uld i3ovltably lead to the di301osure or mtters :;>ioh tta laz ro:;amis as conilcontialsnd in regard of which it All aot allo;r the conridenco to be violeal, 8up?a, said: ‘?!hus the nuestlon of tho 0XDtXldiMOy Or the prodxctioc or tbc reqilired evido:~ce lu rercrrcd, Ilot to the judgmmt or the court berore waloh the action is trying, but or the ofrloer who INS that cvidcnoe ih his p03903aien." Aftor a oarorul exaxinatim or the autiloritles it is a;?parent that the Ranking Cormissioner oan avail h5mseli or the privlleqe or rofuslag to testify about, or to furnish co~ioe of any oxminors report lo his ~o~~sesaion, ii he feels that such disolosuro vould be prejudicial to 3ubld.o interest. If, on the other hahd, ho should dooide that to produoe such lnforzatloa as ho &;ht ?ONJOOS would be to public iarerest, ha oaa do so. z~ticlo 1534a, Par. 2, R.C.J. as aaendcd by .',ota 0r 1937, 45th hgi3Lut.a0 19 ~3 r0ib3: ‘The ::~rikln~,~Co!amlsslonor or'Texas shall ex- :dao or cause LO '3~ OXaAaOd such cornorations mnually or 0Stonor If ho doew It neocosnry. .;ald . IIon. z. Gomltt, January Uth, 1939 ?llgs lie. 5 corporation shall pay the actual traveU.zq ~eqenses, hotel bills, and all other ootual expense lnol- dent to auoh examination and a foe not moeedlag one-oi&th or one per cant or Its aotual oald-in aapital. It auoh oor.soration had not sold In Texas its bonds, notes, oertitiontee, debenturea or other obligations and does not offer for sale or sell In Texas Its bonds, note8, oertlfloates, debentures or other obligations, the SRnking Corn- missioner of T~xns, in lieu of an oxaninatton, shall aooept a fintmial statemmt nado on such foru, containing such informatl.on as he deelres. Tho iPinking Co.m.lssloner of Tsxas is hereby author- ized to appoint not to exoeed one ~aminer for every fifty (50) or suoh oor~oratlons. EElch ax- ardner shall take,the oath and furnish a bond as required or State Sank &a;zfners, and shall re- oelve on anuual salary as r0uOdvf3t** * * **' By virtue of suoh artlole the I3ankla.qComlssiouor 13 ;:lvon po;rer to exanine or cause to be examined alloar- ?ortitions mbraoed by the provisions of Article 1524a. it likewise, provides that eaoh examiner nholl take the oath and Punish :A bead as reqtilred of state bank axcuzlners. In tak- ing tke sam oath as taken by a bank exmlmr, the loan and brokarago co::~ganyoxatiiner ;rould be no nor0 privllcp,od to xake pub110 any inforxatlon conoerni~ tho oondltlon ot any conpcmy excmined by bin, it such infomatlon was rooeivcd by him in the course or his orrlclal duty es suah an examiner, thsn would a bank exaxinor be Driviloeed to make yabllo any inforzatloh he ml&t posoese under slinllsr oiroumstanoes and conditions. Jud.;e Cur&on ooncluded in the ognlon hereln- abovo referred to that a bank exaninor has no authority to dl3olose any lniomatlon reoelved by hln during the oourse of Lis exaninatioa of a bank, if ouch lnfomatlon was reoelv- ed by bin iu the courao of !:lo offlaial duty no suoh oxanlner, except and ;u?leaa he bo npoolfiaally dlreotod by the Banking Cor~i3sloner to do so. I!o authorities are found that will ju;tifg shy ckaago In this conoluolon. It 13 apparmt that the answers to the first and Lst ,uaotions oronounded bv YOU. mist be bnsed unon the sol9 p~upoktlon of -~i?&bor or nbtvyo& aotlon in the ireulsee is uo G!S publlo intorest. It is, thmsfore, t!m o?lnion OP SM$ depu-tmnt t hat : (1) The xrle 02 prlvils-ga pertaining to exarrAners remrts obtains vait!lros?eot to instti- tutlons thnt m-3 closed and not aotlvoly oxqt(;ed in tbclr aoqorate bulnaas ?t the tint the report 1s cnllod for or the privilege invoked. (2) 'If.8rul.e of ?rivllece pertaining to ox- miners report a.~?pliesto loon and brokerage coin- panies, the aame as to banking institutions. (ii)Tho ikd4.n~Cormlosionerhno $iscrction ~SI fhe ;&t$ar of nakL~ public ex9iziners' reports by :ivlzg copiss tnoreor UT yeml%ting the l;:syec- ticn ~h32~Or, or iu %i?ntifyirq or p0mitti;q exm- inms to tcsti+"y under iris s;ipervFsion and express ~cr::l3slon, Zirzlted only by his deoision and die- crntion of ?riMZmr or not thd :raki~~ wi~lio of such inforz&ion I.2to the ?ublio intormt. Trwting'thla f2lly and satisfactorily cm3w3rs~ your bqulry, I :m Your13 ,very truly