NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 22 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 15-30379
15-30380
Plaintiff-Appellee, 15-30381
15-30382
v.
D.C. Nos. 2:94-cr-00398-TSZ
JOHNNY MADISON WILLIAMS, Jr., 2:94-cr-00550-TSZ
2:94-cr-00604-TSZ
Defendant-Appellant. 2:94-cr-00548-TSZ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 8, 2017**
Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Johnny Madison Williams, Jr., appeals pro se
from the district court’s order denying his motion to correct the judgment under
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 36. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
Williams contends that the amended judgment should be corrected to
apportion his 1104-month aggregate sentence between his various crimes of
conviction. We review for clear error. See United States v. Dickie, 752 F.2d 1398,
1400 (9th Cir. 1985). Williams is not entitled to relief, because he has not
identified any clerical error in the amended judgment. Rather, the amended
judgment accurately reflects the district court’s oral pronouncement of Williams’s
sentence. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 36; United States v. Penna, 319 F.3d 509, 513 (9th
Cir. 2003) (“Rule 36 is a vehicle for correcting clerical mistakes but it may not be
used to correct judicial errors in sentencing.”).
AFFIRMED.
2 15-30379, 15-30380, 15-30381 & 15-30382