FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
APR 11 2017
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-10590
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00319-RS-1
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SHAUN W. BRIDGES, a.k.a. Number13,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Richard Seeborg, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2017**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Shaun W. Bridges appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
his 71-month sentence for money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1957, and
obstruction of justice, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Bridges’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Bridges has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because
the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the appeal waiver, we
dismiss the appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2