Otto v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 14-698V Filed: December 9, 2016 UNPUBLISHED **************************** LISA OTTO, as Parent and Legal * Representative of her minor daughter, * A.O., * * Joint Stipulation on Damages; Petitioner, * Meningitis, Varicella, and v. * Diphtheria, Tetanus, and acellular * Pertussis (“DTaP”) Vaccines; SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Brachial Neuritis, Special Processing AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Unit (“SPU”) * Respondent. * * **************************** Ramon Rodriguez, III, Rawls, McNelis and Mitchell, P.C., Richmond, VA, for petitioner. Lara Englund, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1 Dorsey, Chief Special Master: On August 4, 2014, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleged that her minor child, A.O. suffered left upper extremity pain, weakness, paresthesias, and brachial neuritis as a result of the meningitis or varicella vaccinations she received on July 15, 2011 or diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertussis vaccinations she received on August 8, 2011. Petition at 1; see also Stipulation, filed Dec. 9, 2016, at ¶¶ 1-2, 4. Petitioner further alleged that A.O. suffered the effects of her injury for more than six months and neither petitioner, nor A.O., nor anyone on A.O.’s behalf, has filed a civil suit or received compensation for her injury, alleged as vaccine caused. Petition at ¶¶ 7-8; see also Stipulation at ¶¶ 4-5. “Respondent denies that the 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). meningococcal conjugate, varicella, and DTaP vaccines caused A.O.’s brachial neuritis, or any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. Nevertheless, on December 9, 2016, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein. The parties stipulate that petitioner shall receive the following compensation: A lump sum of $125,000.00 in the form of a check payable jointly to petitioner and A.O. on or after January 28, 2017.3 Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id. The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.4 IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master 3A.O.’s birthday is January 28, 1999. See Stipulation at 2 n.1. Thus, A.O. will reach 18 years of age on January 28, 2017. 4 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2