DENY; and Opinion Filed May 2, 2017.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-00444-CV
IN RE TERRENCE MARK GORE, Relator
Original Proceeding from the 302nd Judicial District Court
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DF12-12707-U
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Fillmore, Whitehill, and Boatright
Opinion by Justice Fillmore
Before the Court is relator’s April 28, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus in which he
complains of the trial court’s order granting real party in interest’s motion to expunge lis
pendens. To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has
clearly abused its discretion and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential
Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us,
we conclude relator has not shown he is entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny
relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the
petition if the court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).
/Robert M. Fillmore/
ROBERT M. FILLMORE
JUSTICE
170444F.P05