NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 16-10284
16-10298
Plaintiff-Appellee,
D.C. Nos. 2:13-cr-01382-PGR
v. 4:15-cr-02287-PGR
NAZARIO MARQUEZ-FLORES, a.k.a.
Nazario Flores Marquez, a.k.a. Nazario MEMORANDUM*
Marquez Flores, a.k.a. Nazario Marquez-
Florez,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Paul G. Rosenblatt, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 8, 2017**
Before: REINHARDT, LEAVY, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Nazario Marquez-Flores appeals the 24-month
sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed
alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and the consecutive 18-month sentence
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
imposed upon revocation of supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Marquez-Flores’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
We have provided Marquez-Flores the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in these direct appeals.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
2 16-10284 & 16-10298
United States v. Nazario Marquez-Flores
Combined Opinion