[Cite as State v. Parks, 2017-Ohio-4152.]
COURT OF APPEALS
STARK COUNTY, OHIO
FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
JUDGES:
STATE OF OHIO : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J.
: Hon. William B. Hoffman, J.
Plaintiff-Appellant : Hon. John W. Wise, J.
:
-vs- :
: Case No. 2016CA00168
NELSON SCOTT PARKS :
:
Defendant-Appellee : OPINION
CHARACTER OF PROCEEDING: Criminal appeal from the Canton Municipal
Court, Case No. 2015CRB05075
JUDGMENT: Reversed and Remanded
DATE OF JUDGMENT ENTRY: June 5, 2017
APPEARANCES:
For Plaintiff-Appellee For Defendant-Appellant
TASHA FORCHIONE AARON KOVALCHIK
Assistant Prosecutor 116 Cleveland Avenue N.W.
7th Floor-City Hall Suite 808
Canton, OH 44701 Canton, OH 44702
Stark County, Case No. 2016CA00168 2
Gwin, P.J.
{¶1} Appellant, Nelson Scott Parks [“Parks”] appeals his convictions and
sentences after a bench trial in the Canton Municipal Court on one count of Criminal
Trespass under R.C. 2911.21 and one count of Littering and Dumping under Canton
Municipal Code 521.08.
Facts and Procedural History
{¶2} Parks was charged with one count of Criminal Trespass under R.C. 2911.21
and one count of Littering and Dumping under Canton Municipal Code 521.08. Parks
through counsel filed a jury demand on November 10, 2015. A court trial was conducted
on August 18, 2016. The following evidence was adduced during the trial.
{¶3} On October 28, 2015, Officer Steven Shackle of the Canton Police
Department made contact with Parks at a wooded tree line area of 25th Street west of
Market Avenue in Canton, Ohio. Shackle was responding to a call concerning a male
who was yelling at children. Officer Shackle observed an area of trash bags in the area
that Parks referred to as his home. Officer Shackle instructed Parks to leave the area.
Officer Shackle testified the source of the call concerning Parks was from the property
manager of the Market Ridge Apartments and that the property manager did not want
Parks at the Market Ridge Apartments. Officer Shackle testified that he made contact
with Parks north of the property where the Market Ridge Apartments are located.
{¶4} Officer Nick Casto of the Canton Police Department testified that he made
contact with Parks in the trees behind the Market Ridge Apartments on October 30, 2015.
Officer Casto observed trash bags and garbage at the location. However, Officer Casto
could not testify as to whether Parks was on the property where the Market Ridge
Stark County, Case No. 2016CA00168 3
Apartments were located or if Parks was on the property that makes up part of the Canton
City Parks.
{¶5} Parks testified that he was an archaeologist who lived wherever he was
conducting archeological activities. Parks testified that he was never on the property of
the Market Ridge Apartments and that he was on the property of Weis Park. Parks further
stated that he did not intend to leave garbage in the wooded area where the police officers
made contact with him.
{¶6} The trial court found Parks guilty of Criminal Trespass under R.C. 2911.21
and Littering and Dumping under Canton Municipal Code 521.08.
Assignments of Error
{¶7} “I. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED WHEN IT CONDUCTED A COURT TRIAL
WITHOUT A VALID JURY TRIAL WAIVER.
{¶8} “II. APPELLANT WAS DENIED HIS SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO
EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.
{¶9} “III. APPELLANT'S CONVICTIONS WERE AGAINST THE MANIFEST
WEIGHT AND SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE.”
I.
{¶10} In the instant case, Parks was charged with the petty offenses of Criminal
Trespass under R.C. 2911.21 and Littering and Dumping under Canton Municipal Code
521.08. Parks through counsel filed a jury demand on November 10, 2015. The record
does not reflect that Parks made a waiver of his demand for a jury trial that was in writing,
signed by the defendant, and filed as a part of the record after his jury demand of
November 10, 2015. Additionally, the record is void of some evidence in the record that
Stark County, Case No. 2016CA00168 4
Parks while in the courtroom and in the presence of counsel acknowledged the jury waiver
to the trial court.
{¶11} The Supreme Court of Ohio has held, "[e]ven in petty offense cases where
a defendant properly demands a jury trial, it must appear of record that such defendant
waived this right in writing in the manner provided by R.C. 2945.05, in order for the trial
court to have jurisdiction to try the defendant without a jury.'“ State ex rel. Jackson v.
Dallman, 70 Ohio St.3d 261, 262, 1994-Ohio-235, 638 N.E.2d 563 (1994) citing State v.
Tate, 59 Ohio St.2d 50, 13 0.0.3d 36, 391 N.E.2d 738 (1979), syllabus.
{¶12} The state agrees that in the case at bar, a signed jury waiver is not present
in the record, nor did Parks waive his right to a jury trial in open court as required by R.C.
2945.05.
{¶13} The Ohio Supreme Court and this Court have previously held that the
proper remedy when a jury waiver is invalid is to remand the case to the trial court for a
new trial. State v. Pless, 74 Ohio St.3d 333, 1996–Ohio–102, 658 N.E.2d 766; State v.
White, 5th Dist. Muskingum No. CT2013–0039, 2013–Ohio–5858.
{¶14} Parks’ first assignment of error is sustained.
II & III.
{¶15} Based upon our decision in Assignment of Error I, which necessitates a new
trial, we find these assignments of error are moot. State v. White, 5th Dist. Muskingum
No. CT2013–0039, 2013–Ohio–5858; State v. George, 5th Dist. Licking No.
2010CA00001, 2010–Ohio–3375.
{¶16} Accordingly, appellant’s first assignment of error is sustained and the
second and third assignments of error are moot.
Stark County, Case No. 2016CA00168 5
{¶17} The judgment of the Canton Municipal Court, Stark County, Ohio is
reversed and the case is remanded to that court for a new trial.
By Gwin, P.J.,
Hoffman, J., and
Wise, John, J., concur
State v. Parks
Combined Opinion