Finn v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-280V Filed: May 12, 2017 Not for Publication ************************************* VELMA FINN, * * Petitioner, * * Damages decision based on v. * stipulation; influenza (“flu”) * vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Vaccine Administration AND HUMAN SERVICES, * (“SIRVA”) * Respondent. * * ************************************* Ronald C. Homer, Boston, MA, for petitioner. Voris E. Johnson, Washington, DC, for respondent. MILLMAN, Special Master DECISION AWARDING DAMAGES 1 On May 11, 2017, the parties filed the attached stipulation in which they agreed to settle this case and described the settlement terms. Petitioner alleges she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) caused by her September 18, 2014 receipt of influenza (“flu”) vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s SIRVA or any other injury. Nonetheless, the parties agreed to resolve this matter informally. 1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the special master’s action in this case, the special master intends to post this unpublished decision on the United States Court of Federal Claims’ website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). Vaccine Rule 18(b) states that all decisions of the special masters will be made available to the public unless they contain trade secrets or commercial or financial information that is privileged and confidential, or medical or similar information whose disclosure would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy. When such a decision is filed, petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact such information prior to the document’s disclosure. If the special master, upon review, agrees that the identified material fits within the banned categories listed above, the special master shall redact such material from public access. The undersigned finds the terms of the stipulation to be reasonable. The court adopts the parties’ stipulation, attached, and awards compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth in the stipulation. Pursuant to the stipulation, the court awards a lump sum of $40,000.00, representing reimbursement for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- 15(a) (2012). The award shall be in the form of a check payable to petitioner in the amount of $40,000.00. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment herewith. 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 12, 2017 s/ Laura D. Millman Laura D. Millman Special Master 2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party, either separately or jointly, filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review. 2 Case 1:16-vv-00280-UNJ Document 35 Filed 05/11/17 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS __________________________________________ ) VELMA FINN, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) No. 16-280V (ECF) v. ) Special Master Millman ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH ) AND HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) __________________________________________) STIPULATION The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters: 1. Velma Finn (“petitioner”) filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly sustained following petitioner’s receipt of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a). 2. Petitioner received a flu vaccine on September 18, 2014. 3. The vaccine was administered within the United States. 4. Petitioner alleges that she subsequently suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”), which petitioner alleges was caused-in-fact by her receipt of the flu vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of her injury for more than six months. 5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages as a result of her condition. Case 1:16-vv-00280-UNJ Document 35 Filed 05/11/17 Page 2 of 5 6. Respondent denies that the flu vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged SIRVA and residual effects, or any other injury. 7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation. 8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment: A lump sum of $40,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Velma Finn, which amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). 9. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition. 10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1396 et seq.), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis. 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to 2 Case 1:16-vv-00280-UNJ Document 35 Filed 05/11/17 Page 3 of 5 paragraph 9 of this Stipulation will be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(i), subject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds. 12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and stipulate that, except for any award for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, the money provided pursuant to this Stipulation will be used solely for the benefit of petitioner, as contemplated by a strict construction of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a) and (d), and subject to the conditions of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g) and (h). 13. In return for the payments described in paragraphs 8 and 9, petitioner, in her individual capacity, and on behalf of herself, her heirs, executors, administrators, successors or assigns, does forever irrevocably and unconditionally release, acquit and discharge the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the United States of America from any and all actions or causes of action (including agreements, judgments, claims, damages, loss of services, expenses and all demands of whatever kind or nature) that have been brought, could have been brought, or could be timely brought in the Court of Federal Claims, under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 et seq., on account of, or in any way growing out of, any and all known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected personal injuries to, or death of, petitioner resulting from, or alleged to have resulted from, the flu vaccine administered on September 18, 2014, as alleged by petitioner in a petition for vaccine compensation filed on or about February 29, 2016, in the United States Court of Federal Claims as petition No. 16-280V. 14. If petitioner should die prior to entry of judgment, this agreement shall be voidable upon proper notice to the Court on behalf of either or both of the parties. 15. If the special master fails to issue a decision in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, or if the Court of Federal Claims fails to enter judgment in conformity with a decision that is in complete conformity with the terms of this Stipulation, then the parties’ 3 Case 1:16-vv-00280-UNJ Document 35 Filed 05/11/17 Page 4 of 5 settlement and this Stipulation shall be voidable at the sole discretion of either party. 16. This Stipulation expresses a full and complete negotiated settlement of liability and damages claimed under the National Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, as amended, except as otherwise noted in paragraph 9 above. There is absolutely no agreement on the part of the parties hereto to make any payment or to do any act or thing other than is herein expressly stated and clearly agreed to. The parties further agree and understand that the award described in this Stipulation may reflect a compromise of the parties’ respective positions as to liability and/or amount of damages, and further, that a change in the nature of the injury or condition or in the items of compensation sought, is not grounds to modify or revise this agreement. 17. This Stipulation shall not be construed as an admission by the United States of America or the Secretary of Health and Human Services that petitioner’s alleged SIRVA and residual effects, or any other injury, were caused-in-fact by the flu vaccine. 18. All rights and obligations of petitioner hereunder shall apply equally to petitioner’s heirs, successors and/or assigns. END OF STIPULATION / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 4 Case 1:16-vv-00280-UNJ Document 35 Filed 05/11/17 Page 5 of 5