Estate of Fernando Sauceda v. Jeffrey Pollard

FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUL 11 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESTATE OF FERNANDO SAUCEDA; et No. 15-17518 al., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 2:11-cv-02116-GMN-NJK v. ORDER* CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS and NORTH LAS VEGAS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants, and JEFFREY POLLARD, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, Chief Judge, Presiding Submitted January 9, 2017** San Francisco, California * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges. The district court’s summary judgment orders are VACATED and the case is REMANDED to the district court so that the court can consider the summary judgment issues in light of County of Los Angeles v. Mendez, 137 S.Ct. 1539 (2017). Each party shall bear its own costs on appeal. VACATED and REMANDED. 2