_,-.`. `
\ y ,
, . .~
. @.1
__.
»- `.i
t a '
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
No. l7-745C
(Filed: July 13, 2017) F l LED
NoT FoR PUBchArroN JUL 1 3 2017
US.COURTOF
) FEDERAL CLA|MS
TAVEREN ROB INS ON, )
)
Plaintiff, ) Pro Se Cornplaint; w Sponte
) Disrnissal for Want of
V. ) Jurisdiction; RCFC 12(h)(3);
) Transfer Not Warranted;
THE UNITED STATES, ) 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2012)
)
Defendant. )
)
ORDER
Before the court is the complaint of p_rg § plaintiff Taveren Robinson and his
application to proceed i_n forma pauperis, both filed on June 5, 2017.l S_ee Pl.’s Compl. 4,
ECF No. l. Because the court lacks jurisdiction over plaintiff’s claims, the court must
dismiss this case pursuant to Rule lZ(h)(3) of the Rules of the United States Court of
Federal Claims (RCFC). § RCFC lZ(h)(S) (“If the court determines at any time that it
lacks subject-matter jurisdiction, the court must dismiss the action.”). The court’s
jurisdictional analysis is set forth below.
I. Bacl