NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 18 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MARIE-LOUISE PAUSON, No. 16-35800
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:15-cv-05612-RBL
v.
MEMORANDUM*
BAYVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Washington
Ronald B. Leighton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 11, 2017**
Before: CANBY, KOZINSKI, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
Marie-Louise Pauson appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her action alleging a violation of the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”).
We review de novo questions of our own jurisdiction. Hunt v. Imperial Merchant
Servs., Inc., 560 F.3d 1137, 1140 (9th Cir. 2009).
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Because the foreclosure sale of the property has already been completed, we
cannot grant the relief Pauson requests and we dismiss the appeal as moot. See
Vegas Diamond Props., LLC v. FDIC, 669 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir. 2012) (“[T]he
sale of the real properties prevents this Court from granting the requested relief and
accordingly renders this appeal moot.”); Am. Cas. Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Baker, 22
F.3d 880, 896 (9th Cir. 1994) (a case is moot when there is no longer a present
controversy as to which effective relief can be granted).
DISMISSED.
2 16-35800