Affirmed and Opinion Filed July 21, 2017
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-00823-CR
No. 05-16-00824-CR
CORIN DEON ROBINSON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. F15-75527-H, F16-00440-H
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Wright, Justice Myers, and Justice Brown
Opinion by Chief Justice Wright
Corin Deon Robinson appeals his convictions for two aggravated robbery with a deadly
weapon offenses. Appellant initially pleaded not guilty before a jury. While the jury deliberated
during the guilt/innocence phase of the trial, appellant changed his pleas to guilty and pleaded
true to one enhancement paragraph included in each indictment in exchange for the trial court
capping the punishment at no more than twenty-five years in prison. At the end of the
punishment phase, the trial court found appellant guilty and assessed punishment at twenty
years’ imprisonment in each case. On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which she
concludes the appeals are wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements
of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the
record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573
S.W.2d 807, 811–12 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief
to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro
se response. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (noting
appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel).
We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824,
826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree
the appeals are frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably
support the appeals.
We affirm the trial court’s judgments.
/Carolyn Wright/
CAROLYN WRIGHT
CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
TEX. R. APP. P. 47
160823F.U05
–2–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CORIN DEON ROBINSON, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
No. 1, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-16-00823-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F15-75527-H.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Brown participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered July 21, 2017.
–3–
S
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
JUDGMENT
CORIN DEON ROBINSON, Appellant On Appeal from the Criminal District Court
No. 1, Dallas County, Texas
No. 05-16-00824-CR V. Trial Court Cause No. F16-00440-H.
Opinion delivered by Chief Justice Wright.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee Justices Myers and Brown participating.
Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.
Judgment entered July 21, 2017.
–4–