Order entered July 20, 2017
In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-16-01520-CR
No. 05-16-01521-CR
QIAN HOKASHI-MECHALITH, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 296th Judicial District Court
Collin County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 296-81904-2016 & 296-81905-2016
ORDER
Appellant’s brief was due May 26, 2017. When it was not filed, we notified appellant by
postcard dated May 30, 2017 that the brief was overdue and directed him to file a brief along
with a motion to extend time within ten days. To date, no brief has been filed, and we have had
no further communication from appellant.
We therefore ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s
brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and
recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute these appeals, whether
appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeals. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the
trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708
(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is
ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which
may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this
order.
These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ LANA MYERS
JUSTICE