DENY; and Opinion Filed August 7, 2017.
S In The
Court of Appeals
Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-17-00668-CV
IN RE DAVID C. PETRUSKA, Relator
Original Proceeding from the County Court at Law No. 2
Dallas County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-03303-B
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Francis, Brown, and Whitehill
Opinion by Justice Brown
Before the Court is relator’s June 14, 2017 petition for writ of mandamus. In this original
proceeding, relator complains the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for real
party in interest to submit to a psychological examination by relator’s expert. To be entitled to
mandamus relief, a relator must show both that the trial court has clearly abused its discretion
and that relator has no adequate appellate remedy. In re Prudential Ins. Co., 148 S.W.3d 124,
135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude relator has
not shown he is entitled to the relief requested.
Accordingly, we deny relator’s petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P.
52.8(a).
/Ada Brown/
ADA BROWN
JUSTICE
170668F.P05
–2–
in Re: David C. Petruska
Combined Opinion