·TO BE PUBLISHED
2017-SC-000387-KB
JOSEPH DELANO WIBBELS, JR. -MOVANT
v. IN SUPREME COURT
KENTUCKY BAR ASSOCIATION · RESPONDENT
OPINION AND ORDER
Joseph Delano Wibbels, Jr., 1 moves this court for suspension from the
practice of law under Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 3. 480(2). The parties have
agreed to a negotiated sanction to resolve this disciplinazy action. An
agreement' between the
. . parties sets forth a suspension from the practice of law
for 181 days, With 30 days to serve, and the remainder probated for a period of
5 years, subject to the conditions set forth below, with Wibbels paying all costs. ·
. .-.
'
i Wibbels·was admitted to the practice oflaw on October 18, 1996. His KBA
Nu_mb~r is 83637 and his Bar Roster address is 1427 South 2nd Street, Apt. 10,
Louisville, Kentucky 40208.
I. KBA INFRACTION FILES.
A. KBA File No. 18808.
\
Gary Scott hired Wibbels on· February 24, 2010, paying a $500.00
retainer for. assistance with an employment matter.. Wibbels ended up writing
.
a
single letter on behalf of Scott. It is undisputed that Scott had significant
trouble reaching Wibbels, including missing an appointment that had been
scheduled, for which Scott traveied from Owensboro to Louisville to attend.
Wibbels sent an. e-mail to· Scott explaining he had missed the meeting
because of health issues and offered to return Scott's documents. Scott
. ' \
. requested that Wibbels retuln all of the case files and a refund of the $500.00
. payment. Wibbels did not return the money.
Wibbels initially told Office of Bar Counsel (OB_C) that the $500.00 was a
flat fee to write the single letter and that he had a non-refundable fee
agreement to corroborate this. He failed to provide arty evidence of ~is letter
ru;id later re-~haracterized the fee as a flat fee and offered to create a time log,
which he failed to do. Wibbels was served with a Bar Complaint and a reminc;ier
letter; he failed to respond to the Complaint.
· The Inquiry Commission charged Wibbels with violating SCR 3.130(1.3)
. (lack of diligenceL (L4)(a){3) (failure to keep client reasonably informed),
(1.4)(a)(4) (failure to promptly comply with reasonable requests for mformation),
(1.16)(d) (failure to return client's documents and refund any unearned fee on·
termination of representation), and (8. l)(b) (failure to respond to lawful demand
for information from a disciplinary authority). Wibbels concedes he failed to
comply with these rules.
2
B. KBA File No~ 18813
Tiffanie Hunter hired Wibbels_ on or about February 1, 2010, with regard
to a complaint against her employer. Hunter paid Wibbels $100.00 to write a
letter to her employer, which was to go out Within a week, with a copy sent to
her; Hunter never received a copy of the letter.
Hunter then hired Wibbels to appear for her at an unemployment
hearing. Wibbels accepted the case and said it would be a total $500.00,
applying her previous $100.00 payment to the total. Wibbels failed to submit a
representation letter on Hunter's behalf and further failed to return her file and
unearned fee. Wibbels failed to provide the OBC any documents in response to
allegations of the Complaint. As further conceded by Wibbels, he failed to
respond to the Bar Complaint levied against him.
The .Inquiry Commission issued a 4-count Charge, asserting violations of·
SCR 3.130(1.2) (scope of representation); (1.3) (lack of diligence), {l.16)(d)
(failure to return a client's documents and refund unearned fee on termination
of representation), and (8: l)(b) (failure to respond to lawful demand for
information from a disciplinary authority). Wibbels concedes he failed to
comply with these rules.
C. KBA File No. 19052
On or about January 16,-2010, Stacey Russell sought Wibbels's ·
assistance in an employment matter. Wibbels informed Russell that he would
reach out to her if he needed further information, and took no further action. on
the case. Russell left her name at Wibbels's office while he was ·out sick in the
hospital, and he never returned her call. Wibbels admits he never spoke to
3
Russell .after the initial contact, and further failed to respond to the
corresponding Bar Complaint. .
The Inquiry Commission issued a 4-count Charge, charging Wibbels with
violB;ting SCR 3.130(1.3) (lack of diligence), (l.4)(a)(4) (failure to promptly
comply With reasonable requests for information), (l.16)(d) (failure to return
client's papers on termination-of representation), and (8.l)(b) (failure to
. respond to lawful demand-for information from a disciplinary authority).
Wibbels concedes he failed to comply with these rules.
D. KB.A File No .. 190.61
On or about July 3, 2010, Wibbels was hired by Kimberly Marlett in
conn~Ction with her divorce. Marlett gav~ Wibbels a $2,500.00 check and
authorized him to charge $2,500.00 on h~r credit card. Ort the initial credit
card transaction, the amount of $S,OOO.OO was accidently taken, creating a
total of $7,500.00 given tQ Wibbels.
Marlett requested a $5,000.00 refund since the original fee was.going to
be $2,500.00 up front. On July 19, 2010, Wibbelsissued a check to Marlett for
\
$2,500.00, which was returned for insufficie~t funds. On July 20, 2010,
another $5,000.00 was withdrawn from Marlett's credit card by Wibb.els's
office, creating a total payment of $12,500.00.
Wibbels agreed to make the bad ch~ck good and to refund the additional
charge to Marlett's credit card, but he failed to do either. Further, he did.not
file the divorce on Marlett's behalf and did not refund the unearned fee. Marlett
disputed the char~es to her credit card and received credit for them, but
4
(
Wibbels never repaid the· initial .$2,500.00. Wibbels was served with a Bar
Complairit ~d a reminder letter, but failed to respond to the Complaint.
Th~ lnquiiy Commission· issued a 4-count Charge against Wibbels for
violations of SCR 3.130(1.S)(a) (ch~ging an unreasonable fee), (1.16)(d) (failing
to refund unearned fee on termination of representation), (8. l)(b) (failure to
respond to lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority), and
(8.4)(c) (dishonest conduct). Wibbels concedes he"failed to comply with' these
rules.
E. KBA File No. 19680.
On March 19, 2010, Jodie Thompson, Sr., hired Wibbels to represent
him in a breach-of-contract claim against his former employer and a breach-of-
duty-of'-fair-representation claim against his union. They entere~ into a written
agreem~nt, setting forth a $2,500.00 minimum retainer, with "non-refundable".
) handwritten in parentheses. The agreement further provided-for a contingent
. fee, along with the retainer, and an hourly billing rate of $175.00 per hour, or a
co_i:itingent fee. of 25 percent (if settled .prior to litigation) or 33 percent (if settled·
\
after the filing _of a dispositive motion or after the commencement of trial).
Thompson paid $2,500.00 on M~ch 19, 2010. He paid an additional
$3,500.00 on September 6, 2010, in connection with the same case. After
receiving these funds, Wibbels began representing the National Association of
. Government Employees, an SIU union. Wibbels determined that he could not
represent Thompson because of this conflict, and he told Thompson that .he
· would fmd an~ther attorney to take the case.
5
Unable to reach Wibbels, Thompson contacted.the court and learned that·
his case had been dismissed. Thompson had to retrieve all his papers fFom the
. .
court because Wibbels failed to provide Thompson's new attorney a copy of the
file. Further, Wibbels acknowledged a large portion of the fee Thompson paid.··
him was unearned. Wibbels failed to respond when asked by the Office ~f Bar
Counsel .why he had not refunded the unearned portion of the fee or to provide
proof if any refund had beeri made. He also failed to respond to the Office of
Bar Counsel when it inquired as to whether Wibbels hE!d provided a copy of
Thompson's file to his new counsel. ·
The Inqtliry Commission issued a 6-count Charge against Wibbels,
charging him with violations of SCR 3.130(1.4)(a)(3) (failure to keep.client
reasonably informed}, (1.S)(a) (charging an unre~sonable fee), (1.7)(a) (conflict of
interest), (1.S)(e) (failure to deposit advance, unearned fees into an escrow
account), (1.16)(d) (failure to refund unearned fee and provide copy of file to c
successor counsel), and (8. l)(b) (failure to respond to lawful de~and for
information from a disciplinary autholj.ty). Wibbels concedes he failed to
comply with these rules.
II. ANALYSIS
The matter before the Court today was previously submitted to us but ·
was remanded on August 24~ 2014. In our Order, we expressed concern that
we had been provided inadequate information about Wibbels's psychological
·diagnosis of bi-polar disorder. More specifically,- we were concerned that the
KYLAP program would take longer than the 30 days Wibbels was required to .
sezve as a suspension under the terms of the prior submission. We are
6
satisfied that Wibbels has now provided us with suffic;:ient information to allow
us to rule confidently on this disciplinary matter.
All the instances of :rriisconduct i11 the record .occurred during a time
·when Wibbels was experiencing a mani~ episode caused by his bi-polar
disorder .. Following this manic ·episode Wibbels experienced a period of
depression before seeking professional help.
Since undergoing professional care, Wibbels has not suffered a manic
. (.
episod&--a span of almost 6 years. Wibbels takes medication regularly,·
participates in counseling sessions, attends a bi-weekly bi-polar s1:1pport group,
and maintains a mood journal that keeps him aware of his moods.
These strategies have apparently been effective and have allowed Wibbels
to practice law. Wibbels has received no new disciplinary charges during the
pendency of this matter.
Wfbbels and the KBA have agreed on the punishment to be levied in this
case.
Accordingly~ the Court ORDERS:
(1) Wibbels must repay the total sum of $9.,500.00 as follows: $500.00 to
Gary Scott; $500.00 to Tiffanie Hunter; $2,500.00 to Kimberly Marlett;
and $6,000.00 t<_> Jodie Thompson, Sr. Payments must begin no later
than 30 days after the entry of this Court's Order, and the full amount
must be refunded to each party not later. than 1 year from the date of the
rendition of this order, with Wibbels providing proof of repayment to the
..
OBC on or before that d#ite;
7
i
(2) Wibbels must enter into a Supervision Agreement with the Kentucky
Lawyer Assistance Program (KYLAP) and must fully comply with any
recommendations that may result from such an evaluation. Within 30
days of the date of rendition of this Court's Order, Wibbels must
(a) furnish to OBC an authorization allowing it to discuss with
representatives of KYLAP his compliance with the terms of the ·
Supervision Agreement; and .
(b) provide quarterly reports demonstrating compliance;
(3) Wibbels must attend and successfully complete .the Ethics and
Professionalism Enhancement Program (EPEP), which is presented
annually by the OBC. Successful completion requires Wibbds to pass the
test given at the conclusion of the program. This must be done at
WH)bels's cost and without CLE credit for participation in EPEP. Wibbels
· must execute and provide the necessary authorization for the Office of
Bar Counsel to communicate with the CLE Commission to ensure
Wibbels does not attempt to claim CLE credit for the program;
(4) Wibbels must receive no other disciplinary charges by the Inquiry
Commission during the
I
period of his probation; and
(5) Wibbels must pay all costs associated with this discipline.
(6) If Wibbels fails to comply with any of the terms of the discipline set forth
in this Order, upon motion by the OBC, the Court may impose the
remaining 151-day. period of suspension, which will result in a total
suspension of 181 days. Such a time period wo~ld require ·wibbels to
8
apply for reinstatement through the Character ap.d Fitness Committee
under SCR 3.505 and SCR 3.510.
All sitting. All concur.
ENTERED: September 28, 2017.
CHI USTIC~ JqHN n.:M~NTON, J
9