United States v. Randy Pittman

Case: 16-10251 Document: 00514174580 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/28/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals No. 16-10251 Fifth Circuit FILED Summary Calendar September 28, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff−Appellee, versus RANDY DEWAYNE PITTMAN, Defendant−Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:15-CR-221-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Randy Pittman pleaded guilty of being a felon in possession of a firearm * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. Case: 16-10251 Document: 00514174580 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/28/2017 No. 16-10251 and was sentenced to 51 months of imprisonment and five years of supervised release (“SR”). The term of SR exceeds the statutory maximum term for Pitt- man’s offense, as the parties agree. See 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1); 924(a)(2), 3559(a)(3), 3583(b)(2); United States v. Vera, 542 F.3d 457, 459 (5th Cir. 2008). The judgment is therefore VACATED as to the term of SR, and this matter is REMANDED to modify the sentence consistently with § 3583(b)(2). To the extent that Pittman reurges the arguments he originally put forth in his response to counsel’s now-withdrawn motion filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), he does not have the right to hybrid represen- tation or simultaneous representation by himself and counsel. See United States v. Villafranca, 844 F.3d 199 (5th Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 1393 (2017). After the close of briefing, counsel filed a motion to withdraw at the request of Pittman, and Pittman filed a motion to proceed pro se. Neither coun- sel nor Pittman has established a “conflict of interest or other most pressing circumstances” warranting removal of counsel. FIFTH CIRCUIT PLAN UNDER THE CJA, § 5B. The motions are therefore DENIED. 2