John K. Marlon v. State

FILE COPY COURT OF APPEALS SANDEE BRYAN MARION FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT KEITH E. HOTTLE, CHIEF JUSTICE CADENA-REEVES JUSTICE CENTER CLERK OF COURT KAREN ANGELINI 300 DOLOROSA, SUITE 3200 MARIALYN BARNARD SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78205-3037 REBECA C. MARTINEZ WWW.TXCOURTS.GOV/4THCOA.ASPX TELEPHONE PATRICIA O. ALVAREZ (210) 335-2635 LUZ ELENA D. CHAPA IRENE RIOS FACSIMILE NO. JUSTICES (210) 335-2762 October 31, 2017 Andrew Warthen Kevin Stryker Assistant Criminal District Attorney Attorney at Law 101 W. Nueva St. 217 Arden Grove St. San Antonio, TX 78205 San Antonio, TX 78215 * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * * DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL * RE: Court of Appeals Number: 04-17-00319-CR, 04-17-00320-CR Trial Court Case Number: 2013CR10739W, 2013CR4990 Style: John K. Marlon v. The State of Texas Dear Counsel: The Court has reviewed the record and briefs in this appeal and has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid it in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Therefore, all requests for oral argument are denied, and the cause is advanced for ON BRIEFS submission on December 12, 2017, to the following panel: Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Marialyn Barnard, and Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa. All parties will be notified of the Court’s decision in this appeal in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 48. Either party may file a motion requesting the Court to reconsider its determination that oral argument will not significantly aid the Court in determining the legal and factual issues presented in the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 39.8. Such a motion should be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this letter. Very truly yours, _________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice cc: Nicholas A. LaHood (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)